Music Time/Movie Time: The Social Network

Photobucket

The Social Network

Directed by David Fincher

Written by Aaron Sorkin

Sony, October 1, 2010

Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross

The Social Network

The Null Corporation, September 28, 2010

Buy it (or download a bunch of it for free) from Null

Buy it from Amazon.com

Browsing the web is a mostly silent affair. Isn’t it odd, then, that a movie about the web sounds so wonderful? The most memorable scene in David Fincher’s The Social Network isn’t memorable for how it’s shot or cut, but for how it’s recorded: Justin Timberlake’s Sean Parker regaling Jesse Eisenberg’s Mark Zuckerberg with a vision of capitalistic creativity as an endless series of scores to settle and people to impress, barely audible over the insistent thump and roar of a nightclub soundsystem. To even hear what they were saying, you had to strain; I found myself leaning forward in my chair the way I would if I were in a similar real-world situation, despite the fact that what I was trying to hear wasn’t coming out of someone’s mouth a couple feet in front of me but out of surround-sound speakers all around the theater.

And throughout the film, the movie really comes to life when the score from Nine Inch Nails’ Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross is cued up–pulsing, humming, twitching, ominous, and so prominent in the mix that it’s almost like listening to some invisible robot’s dialogue intertwined with that of the characters we can see. It gives an all-night drunken coding binge the anger and energy of a well-executed assassination (“In Motion,” “A Familiar Taste”), and punctuates a jilted nerd’s lonely walk across a wintry campus with a jet-black thrumming that wouldn’t sound out of place being emitted by Leviathan from Hellbound: Hellraiser II (“Hand Covers Bruise”). Like that nightclub pounding, it’s a presence that’s impossible to ignore, altering and obscuring the stakes and emotions of the nominal scene at hand–like the class-conscious “speaking in code” that puts an end to Zuckerberg’s relationship with Rooney Mara’s Erica Albright in the very first scene, and like the fine print that Andrew Garfield’s Eduardo Saverin ignores to his peril much later on, it’s a truth you need focus on even when your instincts tell you otherwise. It even suggests, through the incorporation of chiptunes (“In Motion,” “Intriguing Possibilities,” “Pieces Form the Whole”), Erica’s kiss-off to Zuckerberg when he confronts her after his creation starts taking off: “Good luck with your videogame.” Boys and their toys.

There’s the crux of the movie right there. Much has been made of the women in this movie, or the lack thereof, and in part rightfully so: Once you’ve learned the Bechdel Test you can’t unlearn it, and it gets increasingly frustrating to watch movies not set in a monastery or prison that don’t have two female characters to rub together. But contra this rather ridiculous Jezebel piece by Irin Carmon and its conflation of the presence of misogyny in a film with misogyny on the part of the filmgoers, I think I understand, and appreciate, what Fincher and writer Aaron Sorkin have done in this war movie about the battle of the sexes. And again I have Reznor and Ross’s work to thank, specifically the sequence where a busload of girls pulls up to a swanky final club for sexytimes with the smart and wealthy. Attempting to pull Ivy League tail to the tune of Trent Reznor? I’ve been there, precisely for the reasons that the film version of Zuckerberg went there: to fill an endless cavern of insecurity, built up over a decade and a half of being the smartest kid in the room, with all the pitfalls and privileges that afforded me. To show that I’m in charge, I’m cool, I’m elite, I’m worthwhile–not the blond jock-gods, but the geek. The women we see in most of The Social Network, the status-hungry sex objects, the fetishized Asians and Californians, those are the women that young smart men who have been turned/turned themselves into young smart creeps see. It’s no coincidence that the film begins and ends with two conversations in which two women of a very different sort than that getting Zuckerberg’s number to the nth decimal. One calls him on being a dick; the other calls him on the fact that, somewhere inside, he knows better than to be one.

Carnival of souls

* Comics news of the week: Josh Simmons’s Cockbone is now online. This was my #3 comic of the year, if you recall. For context, click here. I really want to warn you that this comic is very, very disturbing, so please use your discretion.

Photobucket

* Here’s a pair of photo galleries from the Highwater art exhibit that opened last Friday: Emily Arkin’s gallery on Facebook and Greg Cook’s gallery at the New England Journal of Aesthetic Research. Lined up below are all the comics Highwater ever published. (Via Tom Spurgeon and Peggy Burns.)

Photobucket

* Superman movie update: Zack Snyder directing, David S. Goyer writing, Christopher Nolan producing. Okay, sure.

* Chris Arrant continues his gangbusters guest stint at Robot 6 with an interview with the scary-talented Rafael Grampa. How often do you hear sentences like “Today I’m just a comic book creator, and I think it is an amazing upgrade in my career”?

Photobucket

* Renee French’s H-Day is coming!

Photobucket

* Yesterday’s installment of Brian Chippendale’s Puke Force hit pretty close to home.

Photobucket

* Look, it’s a glimpse of what Zak Smith/Sabbath’s upcoming art show will look like.

Photobucket

* Pascal Girard is doing a graphic novel called Bigfoot. I thought Girard’s debut Nicolas had some real power, so I’m curious to see what he’ll do with one of my beloved cryptozoological creatures.

Photobucket

* Peggy Burns is right–those are some great endpapers by Vanessa Davis. Click the link for more.

Photobucket

* Bloody Disgusting has posted a preview gallery for Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.’s Ron Moore/Eric Heisserer-scripted prequel to The Thing. The movie’s about the ill-fated Norwegian expedition that MacReady and company stumbled across in John Carpenter’s original/remake; that’s noted non-Norwegian Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje on the left, with equally non-Norwegian lead Joel Edgerton. (Via Jason Adams.)

Photobucket

* Speaking of whom, I’m filing this away for later: Jason Adams reviews Let Me In, the Let the Right One In remake from the Cloverfield guy.

* Aw, fuck off, Stephen King.

* Quote of the day: “Suck it, Knowyourmeme.com. If it’s good enough for Austria, it should be good enough for you.” Rob Bricken is what they call the best of the best.

* A first-person horror mockumentary about trolls roaming around in Norway? Sure, why not. (Via Giant Monsters Attack.)


Troll Hunter – English Subtitled Trailer

LOVE AND ROCKTOBER | Comics Time: An interview with Gilbert and Jaime Hernandez

NOTE: Back when I worked for Wizard magazine’s website, WizardUniverse.com, I conducted a series of interviews with alternative-comics creators titled I CAN HAS COMIX? That title was a little problematic with some folks at the company — as were the transcription bills — but whaddayagonnado. I kicked the feature off on June 22, 2007 by speaking with Los Bros Hernandez, and I’m reposting the interview here because I think it’s a pretty solid introduction to/overview of the brothers, Love and Rockets, and what I get out of it all.

Photobucket

I CAN HAS COMIX?: GILBERT AND JAIME HERNANDEZ

In Wizard Universe’s new alternative comics interview column, Los Bros Hernandez reveal how their shared love of punk rock, sexy girls and Silver Age classics helped their epic series Love and Rockets launch the indie scene as we know it

By Sean T. Collins

I’ll admit that it took me a while to hitch a ride aboard Love and Rockets.

Despite the near-universal acclaim the series and its creators have received over the 25 years since the series’ first issue took the comics world by storm and kick-started a small-press revolution–the fruits of which can be seen at this weekend’s MoCCA Art Festival in New York City–there’s something daunting about it. For starters, it’s not just a straightforward one-man show: It’s an umbrella title for the work of Los Angeles-born brothers named Gilbert and Jaime (and sometimes even older sibling Mario), collectively known as “Los Bros Hernandez.”

What’s more, both Gilbert and Jaime have developed their own mini-mythoi within L&R, featuring enough characters to rival your average superhero universe. In Gilbert’s case, you have the busty, hammer-wielding femme fatale Luba and her friends, lovers, family and enemies, all swirling around the fictional Latin-American town that gives Gilbert’s “Palomar” saga its name. Jaime’s stories center on unlucky-in-love mechanic Maggie and her obnoxious punk-rock best friend/sidekick/sometimes-lover Hopey, wild women who are the stand-out members of a loose-knit group of L.A. ladies dubbed “Locas.” Both casts of characters age in real time, meaning some people who started the series as teenagers now have teenagers of their own, with their own adventures. The warts-and-all presentation of the series’ leads (particularly Jaime’s, in my case) can leave you as pissed of as you’d be at your own obnoxious friends.

And to top it all off, Love and Rockets has spawned two separate ongoing series using that title, a raft of trade paperback collections, two massive hardcovers housing nearly the entire “Locas” and “Palomar” sagas, and countless spinoff miniseries, graphic novels and even adult comix. Put it all together and it’s enough to make the friggin’ Legion of Super-Heroes’ continuity seem easy to follow.

Until now.

To celebrate L&R‘s 25th anniversary, publisher Fantagraphics recently began releasing awesomely affordable, handily portable softcover digest collections, starting at the beginning of both brothers’ epic storylines and giving readers their best chance ever to get in on the ground floor. With the first volumes (Jaime’s Maggie the Mechanic and Gilbert’s Heartbreak Soup) already in stores, the second installments–The Girl from H.O.P.P.E.R.S. by Jaime and Human Diastrophism by Gilbert–launched this week, with some of Los Bros’ best work ever on board.

I could go on about both brothers’ mastery of character development, creating people as flawed, funny, and fascinating as your best friends. I could wax rhapsodic about their sophisticated storytelling, which relies on the readers’ intelligence as it bounces back in forth in time and between dozens of characters. I could point out that at different times, it’s the funniest, raunchiest and scariest comic you’ll ever read. I could talk for ages about the gorgeous art–Jaime’s sharp, sexy, stylish classicism and Gilbert’s earthy, equally sexy surrealism. And I could say that while you hear a lot about “creating a universe” in comics, no one’s ever done it better than Los Bros–when you read an L&R story, you feel like you’re catching just a small glimpse of a world as big, sprawling, messy, funny, horny, heartbreaking and real as our own.

Instead, in this joint interview with Gilbert and Jaime, I’ll let Los Bros themselves explain the inspiration of the series, reveal the dark secrets of the stories in the new digests, and announce their pick for the greatest superhero comic of all time. Through it all, it’s clear that when it comes to creating thrilling uncategorizable comics in Love and Rockets, the brothers are still armed and dangerous.

WIZARD: Take us back to 1981 when you guys started the books. What made you say, “Let’s do this”?

JAIME: Let’s see, 1981…I was being paid to go to junior college, so I didn’t want a job. I was just taking art classes and stuff like that. I wasn’t thinking about what I was going to do with my life–I just liked drawing comics. By that time we were drawing comics for ourselves, but we were starting to draw them with ink on the right paper and everything, not just on a piece of typing paper with a pencil. We wanted to print it somewhere but we didn’t know where, because it wasn’t your normal Marvel or DC fare. There wasn’t really much of a market for this stuff, we thought. We were still punk rockers in bands and we were just doing comics. We wanted to draw comics the way we wanted to see them, and we weren’t really seeing much of them out there.

GILBERT: Comics were our amusement for years, and what we were into was not what the mainstream companies were into at the time. We figured that by printing an underground magazine we would get it out there, mostly to see what the response would be–just something to do, really. It turned out that when we finally got our stuff together and put out a 32-page Love and Rockets comic, a fanzine/underground type thing, we were luckily noticed right away by Fantagraphics. The timing was just right–they were ready to publish their own comics. It took a little climb to get Love and Rockets going, but the response was very good, even in a small way at first, so that encouraged us to continue.

It’s not too often that people in the alternative comics area have that kind of success right out of the gate, but I guess you guys didn’t have a lot to compare it to. Before Love and Rockets there were the undergrounds, but they were sort of a different beast.

GILBERT: Yeah. Cerebus and ElfQuest were actually encouraging in the sense that it could be done, getting a following for a black-and-white comic. It wasn’t necessarily mainstream. Even though they were both geared for that audience, they were successful on their own.

Jaime, you had more “mainstream” elements in your early work, with its sci-fi flavor. Was that an attempt to tap the normal comics-reading audience, or was it just you following your bliss?

JAIME: It was pretty much just me. I liked drawing rockets and robots, as well as girls. [Laughs] It really was no big game plan. It was almost like, “Okay, I’ll give you rockets and robots, but I’ll show you how it’s done. I’m gonna do it, and this is how it’s supposed to be done!” I went in with that kind of attitude.

That’s definitely a punk attitude.

JAIME: Yeah. I’d see something was being done in other comics and I’d say, “Ah, no, no, that is not the way to do it. This is the way to do it.” That gave me encouragement to just do it. In the beginning, I was putting my whole life of drawing comics since I was a kid into this comic. When the characters started to take over, the other stuff started to drop out because it was getting in the way.

And the result was a book that’s been credited with inventing alternative comics as we know them, though that couldn’t have been your intention at the time.

GILBERT: I think that we did create a path, at least, using all our influences and what we saw about comics that we knew of since we were kids. That developed into mainstream comics in the ’60s, and undergrounds in the late ’60s, and then in the ’70s you’d have mainstream companies that would also publish black-and-white magazines–different things bouncing around here and there with a different format. That was encouraging to us as well. I think what happened with Love and Rockets is that since there really weren’t the kind of comics we were doing, that is bringing our mainstream influences into a new kind of comic, a new kind of underground, let’s say. An underground with more going on, hopefully. [Laughs] At least I would like to think so. It basically created a path for everybody to at least get on, not necessarily making it easier, but just [having] something there. It was just a different road to go down, and I think that is what we did somehow.

In each of your main storylines, you’ve both created these big, sprawling, interconnected casts over the years. Is that something that two of you talked over, or did it evolve spontaneously and separately out of what you both were interested in doing?

JAIME: I would say that it just kind of happened as the characters started to write themselves. I think because Gilbert started creating all-out characters, it just seemed like a good idea to me, or something. On my end, I basically just created characters that would fill in the gaps of the story. If I needed someone to say something in the back that was totally unrelated to the characters, I would create a character later on. What started out as a drawing of just somebody, I decided, “Hey, I’ll make that someone’s boyfriend.” While in the beginning they were just there to color up the place, after a while they started to take on lives of their own. That is how the characters started to multiply. What about you, Beto?

GILBERT: It would probably be my mainstream influence, with me. Like in, say, Peanuts: You could follow the strip with Charlie Brown and Linus for a few days, and then it would shift to Lucy and Violet. But you wouldn’t lose what the strip was about; it was because all the characters were so well informed that you are always in the Peanuts world. Even if sometimes it was about Snoopy or Sally Brown or whatever, you were always there. That’s on the high end, but in the middle there would be the Marvel Universe, actually, for me. I always liked what fans complain about now: the fact that they were all interconnected. If you needed something heavy and metallic and electronic, you went to Stark Industries. If you needed power, you went to Reed Richards’ unstable molecules. I always liked the crisscrossing of that. Of course it went into madness eventually [laughs], but at first it was very intriguing to a kid. It was something new for superheroes, that interconnecting. In the Hulk comic you could mention Stark Industries, and Iron Man or Tony Stark was nowhere near it but you knew what they were talking about. That is what I liked about it: that interconnecting, even when stuff is off camera. That is pretty much what inspired me to go ahead and do that with mine. That way, you just have a larger canvas to work from.

That’s a big part of L&R‘s appeal–you get the sense that we are following this handful of characters right now as they do things during the course of their day, but that if we just took that camera and moved over a couple of blocks, you could catch someone else in the middle of what is going on in their lives, too.

GILBERT: Yeah, and another aspect is that is how our family worked as well. That’s something we brought from home. Our family, our cousins, aunts and uncles were all interconnected the same way. That was an influence as well, the family unit.

JAIME: Yeah, it was a big family. Our aunt had six kids and our other aunt had six kids.

Talk a little bit about your main characters. In your case, Jaime, it’s Maggie and Hopey, the stars of The Girl From H.O.P.P.E.R.S., and with Gilbert it’s Luba, the main attraction in Human Diastrophism.

JAIME: Maggie started back in high school, where I wanted to create a character I could put into any type of story I wanted–send her to outer space, back to time, to her grandma’s house. She was just a drawing at first, and I just started to think wherever I go, Maggie goes. It took a while, but I put a lot of my thoughts into her, and that’s why she’s the main character and the stories follow her. I created her friend Hopey out of just wanting a sidekick, and seeing the punk girls in L.A. at the time; that was when I was first going to the punk shows. They just kind of hit off together. My Betty and Veronica, you could look at it that way. Or my Batman and Robin. [Laughs] They just worked. When we did the first issue, that was the first response I got: “I like your girl characters.” I went, “Cool, because I like doing them!” [Laughs] That is basically how that started, and Maggie continues because I know her so well and I can put a lot of stuff into her.

GILBERT: My work around the beginning was similar to Jaime’s: a science fiction, two-girls-hanging-out-type thing. Once Jaime’s came out, the response to it was immediate. I could see how much more defined it was [than mine] and how much potential it had. Jaime had already grabbed it and was working that side of it just fine, so I abandoned my stuff and thought, “What is it I really want to say that’s different?” I just kept going back to the idea of this imaginary Latin-American village [called Palomar]. The more I thought about it and the more I felt it out, the more it seemed right. It was completely different from what Jaime was doing. Even from the beginning I thought that Love and Rockets should be a bigger thing. It shouldn’t be just all the same thing, and since Jaime was taking care of that part of it, then doing something completely different but still on the same page would make Love and Rockets a bigger thing, a bigger work of art. So that’s where the encouragement came from, bouncing off the fact that Jaime’s was done and already the response was good, so all I had to do was fill in the rest. I was a little freer, actually, to do something that might not have been commercially viable. I think that Palomar was a little chancier than doing the girl/rocket stuff at the time.

JAIME: I could tell you that Gilbert’s approach helped me a lot in taking the girls out of the science fiction, to handle stuff more at home. Gilbert was the older brother, anyway, so he really did everything before me, ever since we were little. [Laughs]

GILBERT: What’s very interesting about the science fiction stuff is that the question we get asked the most, at least out loud, is “Where is the rocket? That’s the real Love and Rockets.” Oddly, that’s the smaller segment of the audience–they’re just more vocal. The real audience is the one who followed Maggie and Hopey’s adventures as real girls, so to speak, and the Palomar stories. That is the real Love and Rockets reader. But for some reason we have the most outspoken ones saying, “When are you going to do the rockets? It’s called Love and Rockets!” That’s fine, we love doing rocket stuff, but the real Love and Rockets is what we are famous for.

You mentioned that the audience has changed, and now the less genre-y things are actually more commercially viable. Jaime’s had his work published in The New York Times, your recent collections have gotten major mainstream-publication review acreage–could you ever have seen this coming?

JAIME: I think that for me, it was more a case of, “One of these days, sure, I’d like my character standing next to Charlie Brown and Betty and Veronica and Superman.” But I was just hoping we would be able to continue doing it and hopefully make a major living off of it because I didn’t want to do anything else with my life. It was like, “Oh boy, I can continue!” But “How long is this going to go?” I wasn’t even thinking about it. Twenty-five years later, I’m going, “Wow, a quarter of a century and I’m still allowed to do this?” It’s amazing. I just think back to all the talented people I knew in the past who had to stop because they just couldn’t live off of doing their comics.

GILBERT: The one time I got thrown was when we were getting a lot more attention doing Love and Rockets and people were really accepting what we wanted to do in it. What really threw me was when I got to a point where readers would tell us, “I used to read Batman, but now I read your stuff.” I thought that was really creepy. I’d go, “You mean you’d rather read us than Batman?” Batman, Superman, all that stuff–they were icons when we were growing up. Nobody ever thought somebody would rather read stuff that wasn’t that. It just threw me and was something I never really thought about, that someone might like a different kind of comic outside of the Big Two. For us it was always a note of encouragement: “We just better step up to the plate then. If this is what they are saying about us, if this is what they like about us, then we better be good!” And we’ve done our best to stick to our guns about giving the most honest comic we can–coming from our point of view, of course. But it threw me for a bit. It seemed like we were being scrutinized for a while, like, “Okay, this stuff is getting more attention than The Incredible Hulk, so let’s see what they’re gonna do next.” We were like, “Oops!” The only thing you can do is try to get better. Otherwise you’d crumble if you tried to compromise or change things.

What do you think of the new digest versions of your work?

GILBERT: For me, I just trust our publisher. I don’t have the say of how it is going to be packaged, because I couldn’t tell you how, so I have to trust them a lot. I think it’s great if it’ll just give us shelf space. Don’t colorize it or something like that. [Laughs] But as long as it’s presentable and someone will put it on their shelf, that’s all I can ask for.

Jaime, your latest digest includes “The Death of Speedy” and “Flies on the Ceiling,” two of your best-known–and darkest–stories. How did each of them come about?

JAIME: Back before “The Death of Speedy” and “Flies on the Ceiling,” I did this story about Speedy talking to his friend about his sister Izzy. He mentioned how she was all normal and then she went to Mexico and came back weird. When I wrote that, I didn’t know exactly what happened to her. I got that question every time: “What happened to Izzy in Mexico?” I’d say, “Oh, I’ll tell you one of these days.” But to myself I was saying, “Yeah, when I find out!” [Laughs] It took almost 10 years to write. It all came from that, and it took on many forms and shapes and sizes till I finally did “Flies on the Ceiling.” With “The Death of Speedy,” certain continuity was building up in the drama, and all of this was building up to where I wanted to kill somebody. I wanted someone to die. But it was another one of those things where I thought, “I’ll show you how to have someone die.” I was going to challenge myself and everybody else. Speedy became the guy just because of the way things were going: I wanted to kill a main character, and he was a victim of my plans. [Laughs] It didn’t have to be him, but it ended up being him. Years after that I asked myself, “Should I have ever killed him?” It was just one of those things that he fell victim to.

Do you ever wish you could bring him back to life, Superman-style?

JAIME: That’s the cool thing with Love and Rockets: You can always have flashbacks. It doesn’t mean they come back to life; you just tell a story that happened not to screw with history. Which I get really close to, sometimes, just because it’s tempting. I can always bring Speedy back–just in the past. I don’t want it to become formula. I have to do it right.

Gilbert, in your case, again, it’s fairly dark material, since “Human Diastrophism” is about a serial killer preying upon Palomar. What made you let loose this violence on these characters in this town you created?

GILBERT: There was no direct line, no conscious effort to be that dark. It just sort of came out as the stories were developing. Whatever darkness there was is from my unconscious. I don’t really know what the source, but I just wanted darker stories. I was also tired of the cramped format, doing a few pages an issue; I wanted to do a longer story, and the longer the story is, I feel I have to give more. I was basically doing stories unchecked, throwing everything in that I could. In those days I would write stories thinking, “When I finish this story, if I get hit by a truck the next day, then I’ll be satisfied that this is my last story.” I don’t do that anymore. Now I think, “Oh, that was my first story,” and that works just as well when I work. “This is my first story, I’m just getting started, I’m just learning.” In the old days it was the other way around: “Okay, if I’m done with the story then I’m done, but I better get down to business.” I wanted to do the world in a microcosm that had death and rebirth. Everything that you can imagine in an epic story, I tried to stick it in one big story. Like Jaime’s story, I chose a character because whenever you are dealing with a story that big and that universal, the characters that you hurt the most have to be ones you care about, unfortunately. You can’t just make up a character and kill them, because it doesn’t matter. If it’s a character that the readers cared for to a degree, that’s what gives the story more resonance, especially in a large story like that. We don’t really do it to shock or anything, but it’s just part of life.

That is what I was going for with that. And once I was done with it and it did get very good response, then what do you do after that? You just start all over and do your damnedest not to cheapen the story. You try not to refer too much to that story, unless it’s little things you need that you left out or something. Jaime and I are clever enough to bring back those characters in a legitimate way, without cheapening it. In Jaime’s “The Death of Speedy,” you never really see what happened–it could have been somebody else and not Speedy who was killed. There’s that little twist that you can do and make it convincing. The same with Tonantzin setting herself on fire in my story. I could very well say it wasn’t her, it was a set-up. I’m just saying that we’re able to do stories where we can make it work–we’re just not going to. It’s too easy, it’s too pat, and it just cheapens the earlier story.

The characters in both the “Locas” and “Palomar” stories aren’t like the ones in Peanuts or in Riverdale High or in the Marvel Universe–they age in real time. Why’d you make that choice, and do you ever regret it?

JAIME: First of all, it was Gilbert’s idea to actually age them. I’ll let him explain.

GILBERT: I was thinking of a sprawling epic that took years to complete. I think I aged them too quickly for my taste now. I definitely regret that it was a little too quick compared to how long we have been doing it. We’ve been doing it for 25 years and that is not really too quick, but it is in terms of comics because I’m still doing them. I’m not done with the characters that are getting older. What happens is you get the “Tiny Yokum syndrome”: The old strip Li’l Abner was about a bachelor who was being chased by a lovely woman, [and eventually] they married and had a kid. Well, now Li’l Abner is responsible. He can no longer have wacky, nutty adventures because he’s married and has a kid. He has to stay home and take care of the family. What they did was create a character, his little brother, named Tiny. Basically, Tiny had the adventures that Li’l Abner could no longer have–but we don’t know Tiny, we know Li’l Abner. The problem that happened with aging my characters too quickly is that I had to come up with characters to replace the older characters, and it’s not as good. I’ve had several characters to replace my main character Luba, but none of them are Luba. That presents itself in that way, even though some readers probably don’t even know who Luba is because they only read the new ones. That’s fine, but it’s something I regret a little bit, and I keep pushing the main characters back.

Jaime, earlier you compared Maggie and Hopey to Betty and Veronica, but in this case there’s no Archie. Both of you focus on female characters. Was that a conscious choice? Did you just like drawing girls or did you really think you had something to say about women?

JAIME: I think it all started when I was a budding teenager and Gilbert was a teenager, and he said, “Jaime, you should start drawing girls.” And I went, “No, I can’t do that–Mom will kill me!” And he just goes, ‘No, it’s cool,” because he was drawing girls left and right. I started and I thought, “Oh God, I can’t draw girls–[mine] are so terrible!” Then after a while you couldn’t stop me. It all started from wanting and liking to draw women. They are much more fun than drawing men. I thought, you can have your cake and eat it too if you do your comic starring the women instead of the men. You can have men, but you get a lot more done if you are drawing a character you like. At the same time, it’s something Gilbert talked about earlier: When I was young, I always felt that if I was going to put something in my comics, I had to back it up. I had to step to the plate and be responsible. So there was always talk about T&A–“You just like women as objects” and stuff. I was like, “No I don’t–look!” So I started making them characters. I thought, “That’s easy! Just do it! I don’t have to feel responsible to create 10-hundred male superheroes to 10 female superheroes–I can just concentrate on the female superheroes!” That’s how it started for me. Gilbert was well on his way before me, being the older guy. I just followed along.

GILBERT: A lot of Love and Rockets is just simply what we wanted to do, even superficially–if we feel like drawing a person wearing these clothes, doing this thing, just because we feel like drawing that. Most of the time it’s a woman doing it. Then we started giving the characters personalities, like Jaime said, having our cake and eating it too. There was a weird little rub there because we kept getting asked, “Why are you doing women?” Just the fact we were asked that all the time, it was like, “Something is wrong here if you have to ask us why. Why do anything? Do people ask Frank Miller why his stories are so violent?” People are fine with violence but they’re nervous about women for some reason. So we are always up to the challenge. We stick our elbows up and go, “Look, we’re gonna do this and we’re gonna do it as best we can.” We kept getting encouraged–the more we did it, the more good response we got. Then every once in a while, “Why do you do women?” and I thought, “It is really a boys’ club out there, isn’t it?”

JAIME: It was almost like the more they told us not to, the more we did it. It was like, “I don’t see anything I’m doing wrong here. What am I afraid of?”

Who do you consider your peers? What other comics out there interest you?

JAIME: It’s harder for me to say now, because I’ve gotten so locked in this Love and Rockets world of mine, creating my stories and not looking at anyone around me, so I don’t know. I guess it’s competition on the shelves: “Who’s taking up my shelf space?” That’s how it is [now]. When Gilbert and I started out, it was like we were welcomed by the mainstream when the comic first came out, but we didn’t have the heart to tell most of the mainstream, “We don’t want to do what you guys are doing.” I didn’t want to be an assh— about it or anything–we were getting all this support–but we thought, “Oh, so you’re gonna do Secret Wars? After we talked about how there’s a new comics world, you’re gonna go back and do that? Well, fine, you do that, but don’t ask me why I’m not.” It wasn’t till more alternatives and people with their own goofy comics like ours started popping out that we started to get these peers coming out of the woodwork. I would say when the Peter Bagges and the Dan Clowes started coming out too, we kind of formed this little… I don’t want to say club, because everyone lived in a different state. [Laughs] But we liked seeing each other at conventions and events like that.

GILBERT: Were you talking about peers now?

That would be the follow-up. Are you also “head-down,” like Jaime?

GILBERT: I am, pretty much. I’m just so focused on getting work out that I look for influences and for other things to inspire me, [and] rarely is that another comic book these days. One reason is that alternative comics, as far as series go, are barely there anymore. Love and Rockets is one of the few that comes out on a relatively regular basis that continues this old tradition that is pretty much gone now. It’s mostly graphic novels and online comics. It’s just different, and a different way to get ahold of comics. The alternative comics they call pamphlets now are simply not around like they were. I don’t look at comics on the Internet. I don’t really look at the Internet too much. I’m focused on writing the best comics I can, and that takes up most of our lives, really. I don’t want to dis anybody or ignore anyone–I’m just not really focused on things outside at this time.

JAIME: I find that when I go to a comic store I leave with an old Marvel or DC archive 99 percent of the time.

It is kind of a golden age for that stuff. The sheer volume of old stuff that is coming into print in really nice books is amazing.

JAIME: Gilbert told me recently that they did the complete [Steve] Ditko Amazing Spider-Man, and I’m just achin’ to go and get that.

GILBERT: Actually, that just came out, and here is a plug for Marvel. I think that now that that’s collected, the Ditko-[Stan] Lee Spider-Man, I think we finally have a book to show and put down and say, “This, for me, is the best superhero comic ever right here.” There has been stuff that has been pretty close, like [Will Eisner’s] The Spirit and [C.C. Beck’s] Captain Marvel and other things, but this, to me, is the grail of superheroes. It’s great to have it in a package like that. Which means I have to rebuy it. [Laughs] I’ve bought that stuff so many times now in different formats.

JAIME: So this is what we’re influenced by, see? [Laughs] We have nothing to show about the new stuff–this is all stuff we liked when we were kids.

What does Love and Rockets have that would appeal to the kinds of readers who haven’t said yet, “I used to read Batman, but now I read you guys?”

JAIME: It’s more difficult these days, because there are more ways of getting ahold of comics with the Internet and different things now. I think what hooked people, the mainstream readers, from reading Batman or Superman and went to Love and Rockets is that [we] were serialized at the time. New stories about Maggie and Hopey were continued from issue to issue, new stories about Palomar continued from issue to issue. The reader could identify with that, reading a serialized adventure that was similar, superficially, to reading a Batman comic. Now Love and Rockets is different, a little more fragmented, a little more experimental, a little more idiosyncratic, I think. It’s different from how mainstream comics are read now. I get a bunch of free [mainstream] comics every month, and I look at them, and you got to be really into them to know what’s going on. You have to be a fan of that particular book to know what is going on. It’s a different day now, a different way to look at comics now, so it’s probably not as easy to grab that audience these days.

I know when I started getting into you guys it was difficult because of the array of formats and editions that were out there: You had the ongoing series, the trades, the spinoffs…But I feel like now, with the digests, it’s nice and easy. In the same way that now a lot of the superhero comic book companies are collecting the complete Lee-Ditko Spider-Man and all these big giant historical runs of series in these easy-to-follow collections, it’s now a better time than ever to get in on the ground floor of Love and Rockets and start from the beginning pretty easily and affordably. I’ve seen it happen around the office–those digests spread like wildfire.

JAIME: I imagine that is what is going to happen with reprinting this old stuff. It’s sort of like seeing 11-year-old kids with Ramones shirts now–three of the main Ramones are dead. [Laughs] Their music is over 30 years old now, and 11-year-olds are into the Ramones! So you never know. There could be a Lee-Ditko Spider-Man comeback with kids. Who knows?

GILBERT: I met an 8-year-old kid a couple of years ago whose mom kept badgering him: “This guy draws comics! Tell him who your favorite Spider-Man artist is!” And the kid, under his breath, goes, “Ditko.” I was like, yes! [Laughs]

JAIME: Ditko quit in ’67, so it was a long time ago. It’s kind of cool, things being in perpetual print.

Any closing words of wisdom?

GILBERT [in mock-pretentious voice]: We’re not only mainstream geeks here– we’re actually progressive artists. [Laughs] I’m kidding. I don’t know about the progressive part and I don’t know about the artist part. [Laughs] We’re going to continue doing Love and Rockets projects that strike our fancy. And I have a couple of other books coming out. One will be a Dark Horse miniseries which will eventually become a graphic novel called Speak of the Devil–that’s in stores this July. I have another graphic novel coming out in June called Chance in Hell, and that’s my first actual graphic novel with Fantagraphics. It’s in the digest size–not quite as small as manga, but around that size. Hopefully, the casual reader will be like, “Hey, there’s a small book–it must be manga!” [Laughs] That could help!

Carnival of souls

* Comic Con International is staying in San Diego through at least 2014. I think that’s really good news. I like going to San Diego, I like the familiarity of the environs and the rituals, and I thought moving the Con to Las Vegas, Los Angeles, or Anaheim would only serve to heighten the show’s most unpleasant aspects. Tom Spurgeon interviews CCI’s David Glanzer about the decision and offers additional commentary.

* Highwater link #1: The oral history of Highwater Books continues. This installment focuses on publisher Tom Devlin’s stubbornly idiosyncratic design sense and take on the role of a publisher, as well as his John Locke/Benjamin Linus-style relationship with Jordan Crane.

* Highwater link #2: Greg Cook presents some behind-the-scenes photos from the Highwater art show opening tonight, for which the oral history was assembled.

Photobucket

* Highwater link #3: Cartoonist Jim Rugg explains how Highwater influenced him. He also posts a few pages from a pamphlet he made up out of the email snippets that ran across the bottom of every page in the Comics Journal issue Highwater guest-edited. For the publisher that introduced twee to comics, there was an astonishing amount of shit-talking!

Photobucket

* Speaking of awesome-sounding Highwater-related art shows I’m probably never going to get to see, Dan Nadel has posted some awesome photos from Mat Brinkman’s show at The Hole in NYC. The drawings are all actually black and white–each room in the gallery is lit with a different color.

Photobucket

* David Bowie’s coming out with a book of photos and essays called Bowie: Object, containing the stories of 100 things from his archives and vaults and what have you. I always loved this Kirlian aura photograph from his Nazi/Crowley/cocaine freakout days. Such a meticulous note-taker! (Via Pitchfork.)

Photobucket

* Speaking of books in progress by my all-time heroes, work on Clive Barker’s Pinhead sendoff The Scarlet Gospels proceeds apace. (Via Dread Central.)

* I kind of slept on last year’s album and haven’t listened to this year’s yet, but it’s important to remember that Electric Six are actually pretty great. (Via Matthew Perpetua.)

Comics Time: Locas, or Announcing LOVE AND ROCKTOBER

NOTE: Nearly six years ago, I panned Jaime Hernandez’s life’s work in The Comics Journal. Though this is probably the Comics Journal-est thing I’ve ever done, for the Journal or anywhere else, it’s not one of my prouder moments as a critic. At the time I was coming down from the high of brother Gilbert’s epic Palomar hardcover and his two stand-alone masterpieces Poison River and Love and Rockets X. By comparison, Jaime’s stuff, though prettier on the outside, was basically about the female Latina punk versions of Beavis and Butt-Head. Unable to see past the fact that Maggie and Hopey were annoying and did stupid shit a lot of the time, I gave Locas, which collected all their stories from Love and Rockets v1, a bad review.

Here’s where I make up for it.

I happy to announce the start of LOVE AND ROCKTOBER here at Attentiondeficitdisorderly. For the next month, I’ll be devoting my regularly scheduled Comics Time reviews to as much of Los Bros Hernandez’ work as I can get through, starting with the Jaime material I misguidedly maligned. I believe that Love and Rockets is all but unique in comics in the way it has taken advantage of serialization to slowly create a rich and enveloping world peopled with multifaceted characters who seem to be living lives on and off the page. And it did this twice, simultaneously! With this in mind I think it’s a book that’s best consumed the way great TV shows are best consumed: In huge, weeks-long binges. It may be Fantagraphics’ wonderful Love and Rockets digests facilitating this rather than Netflix, but the principle is the same.

So, first up, Jaime and the Locas stories. After that? I might continue forward with Xaime till I’m caught up. I might switch over to Beto’s stuff. (And Mario’s too!) I might do both (which I imagine would necessitate LOVEMBER AND ROCKETS). I might do neither. But whatever I do, I’m going to enjoy the hell out of it, and I hope you do too.

First, let’s start by revisiting sins past: My Comics Journal review of Locas, which I’d avoided re-posting here on the blog for years, waiting for precisely this sort of opportunity to serve as a corrective. Please take everything you are about to read with a grain of salt, as much of what I once saw to be weaknesses I now recognize as strengths. And Jaime, if you’re out there: Sorry, man!

Photobucket

Locas

Jaime Hernandez, writer/artist

Fantagraphics Books, October 2004

712 pages, hardcover

$49.95

Buy it from Fantagraphics

Buy it from Amazon.com

The first collection to span one of Los Bros Hernandez’ major output during the first 20-year run of their umbrella title Love and Rockets was Palomar, an anthology of brother Gilbert’s chronicles of the titular Mexican town. Aside from a few frustrating attempts to muddle through the multi-genre mishmash of Music for Mechanics, L&R‘s first softcover volume, Palomar was my first real exposure to Los Bros’ series. To say “it’s a tough act to follow” would be to imply that one of maybe the three or four greatest achievements in comics history could be followed at all, so instead I’ll say that I was almost totally unprepared for how thoroughly the book would floor me. Gilbert’s uncanny grasp of the totality of each of his characters allowed him to jump back and forth in time with ease, showing us different periods in their lives that for all their temporal disconnect never made anything but perfect sense for each indelible creation. His senses of humor, horror, and eroticism would each be enough to sustain the career of a lesser cartoonist for years at a stretch. The book succeeded as maybe the great long-form narrative in comics, even (as I learned later) despite the fact that it for some reason omitted major related works like Love and Rockets X and especially Poison River, without which much of the book’s concluding section was difficult to follow. Perhaps most impressively, Gilbert’s mastery of the formal stuff of cartooning — of line, design, characterization, caricature, panel transitions, the whole shmear — was so complete that I had to wonder (partially in skepticism, partially in giddy anticipation of fresh discoveries), “The other brother’s supposed to be the better artist?”

Locas, Love and Rockets‘ second definitive hardcover collection, focuses on the work of that other brother, the “better artist,” Jaime — and I’m not sure if I can remember a more awkward comics-reading experience than my recent sojourn through its 700-plus pages. I say this not because of the book’s unwieldy length. I say it rather because of the dual irony that this massive collection could consist of material that feels so slight, and that after reading the single longest comic book I’ve ever come across I should find myself with so little to say.

One thing I will say, since it’s unavoidable, is that the book is nowhere near the masterpiece that Palomar is. It could be argued that it’s unfair to compare the two works simply because their authors are brothers. Now, I don’t think it could be argued persuasively — when one spends years and years sharing funnybook real estate with one’s sibling and indeed adopts a collective moniker, one invites such comparisons — but that’s not even the point. Locas suffers in comparison to Palomar, but so do most comics. The point is that it suffers from much more than that as well.

Things get off to a rough start with the uneasy blend of sci-fi, soap opera and cheeky revolutionary politics found in “Mechanix” and “Las Mujeres Perdidas,” the two big storylines that begin the collection. This is not to say that even these unrepresentative, shaky stories do not have much to recommend them. Here Jaime’s art most clearly displays his classic influences, imbuing the dinosaur-fighting and rocket-flying action with beauty and dynamism. “Mechanix”‘ unusual structure — a series of letters from traveling mechanic Maggie to her best friend and fellow punk Hopey, punctuated with predominantly stand-alone panels which illustrate the text — serves as an early indication of Jaime’s great strength, that of graphic design. The title panels/pages Jaime constructs are inevitably the best looking part of any of his stories, as they allow his gifted use of high contrast and his inventive and iconic lettering and portraiture to shine; since “Mechanix” is essentially a series of such images, it’s awfully nice to look at.

Yet already the flippant tone Jaime adopts for writing his characters, one he will be unable to shake off throughout the book, works to his detriment. Maggie essentially has two settings for looking at the world: Everything’s either a goof or a tragedy. This gives these early stories, in which the lives of thousands of people, including our heroine and her friends, are often at stake in power struggles between crazed plutocrats, an air of frantic, bipolar absurdity that does not at all suit them. Perhaps the intention was a sort of Duck Soup-style lampooning of love and life in the nuclear age, but the stories come off as inconsistent and unsure of what they want to be and how they want to be it.

Before long the sci-fi trappings are shed entirely, seemingly more out of embarrassment than aesthetic evolution. The high-decibel hijinx, however, remain. Maggie and her sometime-girlfriend, sometime-best friend Hopey spend the bulk of the book fuming, with exclamation points and distorted kabuki-mask faces abounding. Listen, I’ve certainly known people who’ve spent years and years dancing around their true feelings for each other, but never so loudly! It’s like a soap opera scripted by Fourth World-era Jack Kirby! When quieter characters like Hopey’s ex-girlfriend and current bandmate Terry or witchy, death-haunted Izzy appear, I swear I can hear my ears ringing in the relative silence.

If Jaime has a claim to greatness in these pages, it’s in his creation of those two comparatively minor characters. Terry Downe looks so much like The Amazing Spider-Man‘s Mary Jane Watson that she might as well be a fanfic version of her: “What if Gwen Stacy had lived, and M.J. moved to California, got into punk rock, and became a lesbian?” But behind her resolute, John Romita-derived wall of punk cool, there’s just oceans of pain, observable both in her relentless quest for musical success (given what we know of her, this may well be possible) and for Hopey (given what we know of Hopey, this isn’t). She’s easily the book’s most compelling character, and the story in which she stars, “Tear It Up, Terry Downe,” is easily its most compelling sequence. With alarming proficiency not in evidence elsewhere in the book, Jaime constructs a riveting story out of disjointed panels, each depicting a scene from different stages in Terry’s life or a comment from someone who knows or knew her, each offering a vital glimpse of the origins of her reserved persona. Clearly, it’s one born out of trauma rather than pretension. (Would that this could be said for the object of her unrequited love: Hopey’s early relationship with Terry is undoubtedly tumultuous, but it feels as though this simply brought out obnoxious qualities in the character that were already extant.)

Black-clad psychic Izzy is also a revelation. Her premonition of disaster in “The Death of Speedy Ortiz” is the truly haunting moment in a story I found to be otherwise quite oversold by its admirers (who are many, and vocal); her fascination with the missing-persons ad Hopey eventually finds herself on is equally memorable, as is her quietly built-up battle with cancer, and indeed the simple presence of her stoic countenance in a book that’s full to bursting with mugging. But Izzy’s great shining moment, “Flies on the Ceiling,” isn’t even included in the collection. Meanwhile, a zany, Warner Bros.-style Maggie’n’Hopey romp redrawn from a comic made when the brothers were little kids is included, proving that the parameters of the collection — “The Maggie and Hopey Stories” — may have been more than a little short-sighted.

Jaime’s technical skills as an artist are not to be scoffed at, obviously. This is a beautiful book. Each of his characters is a wonder in design, and even as Jaime’s style shifts from the rendered EC-isms of the early stories into a sort of graphic-design shorthand by book’s end, you simply have to marvel at his skill in creating recognizable characters who maintain their essence through over a decade of hairstyle and hair-color changes, weight gain and loss, and radically shifting stations in life. (This last, too, is a strength of the book: Locas is one of comics’ more interesting explorations of the simultaneous fluidity and rigidity of America’s class-and-race caste system, all the more so since the topic seems to get explored almost incidentally.) The art’s strongest moments come during several pin-up style panels depicting Hopey and Terry’s band on stage during their ill-fated tour. Simply put: If there are better depictions in this medium of the allure of punk rock than the page-spanning panels in “Jerusalem Crickets 1987,” I’d like to see ’em. Too bad that so few of the characters seem to have gotten much more out of punk than an excuse to act like jerks and push their loved ones away — and too bad we’re supposed to think that the band’s drummer is an idiot for wanting to play like John Bonham. Odd that an artist’s love of technical proficiency would be mocked in a Jaime Hernandez comic!

Meanwhile, Jaime’s temporal jump-cuts demonstrate a wonderful faith in the intelligence of the reader to follow the increasingly complex lives of the characters. The problem here, though, is that the characters lack the strength of characterization to back these jumps up. As presented within Locas, too many characters suddenly appear from nowhere and are given prominence that their development itself won’t bear. The character of Tex, for example, emerges suddenly to become a pivotal player during some of the book’s central stories: He helps Hopey escape from her band’s rapidly imploding tour, then ends up impregnating both Hopey and her larger-than-life trophy-wife friend Penny Century before just kind of petering out of the storyline. Now, I can already hear people say “but this is how life works,” and indeed I’ve got a roster of ex-friends as long as your arm to prove it, but life also includes two hour visits to the DMV. Trueness to life is a potential means to the end of great art, not a guarantor of it. (At any rate, few people’s true-life trajectory involves knocking up two lipstick lesbians in one of said lipstick lesbians’ so-big-there-are-whole-wings-no-one-sets-foot-in mansion, owned by said lipstick lesbian’s horned husband.) A natural-feeling rapport between familiar and out-of-nowhere characters can be established — see Ralph Cifaretto’s introduction in The Sopranos, Wolverine’s conversation with Doop in Milligan and Allred’s X-Force (I shit you not), or really any such incident in Palomar — but in Locas the continuous accrual of sisters, cousins, roommates, co-workers, ex-girlfriends, bandmates, tag-team partners and so on feels forced and arbitrary, and at its worst like a convenient distraction from the voids at the centers of the two main characters.

That, too, is the problem. Yes, I’m sure we all know basket cases like Maggie and angry youth like Hopey, but so what? I also know several people (say) with masters degrees in engineering, and if they weren’t also interesting people, no degree of accuracy in the depiction of their lives would save a comic I might make about them from being rather pointless. Near as I can tell, there’s simply not much to Maggie and Hopey. The funny thing is they are so very often held up to be the pinnacle of multi-dimensional female characters in the male-dominated world of comics. Now, I’m not sure I see the feminist victory present in the ongoing chronicles of beautiful, bed-hopping, punked-out teenage lesbians; otherwise I guess we could all trade in our P.J. Harvey records for those Tatu girls. (And let’s not even get started on Penny Century, a character whose sole purpose seems to be to conveniently deploy her tits, mansions, or both, depending on the needs of a given story.) But even putting all that aside, what is so wonderfully multi-dimensional about a girl who is continuously pining, fuming, or (to steal a line from Tina Fey’s Mean Girls) eating her feelings, or a girl whose sole, and I do mean sole, means of interacting with the world is to embrace terrible behavior on the part of herself and those around her toward anyone she might be tempted to care about? The torpedoing of one’s own chances at happiness is often a fascinating topic for comics, yet only if the character doing the torpedoing seems to have some inner life worth preserving does that fascination arise. Hopey, a character who among other things bounces back from a miscarriage like it was the common cold, ostentatiously applauds the sexual depravity of a group of wealthy acquaintances until it inevitably erupts into violence, kicks the snot out of her ex-best friend for no good reason, and (during a flashback) delivers her new friend Daffy into a terrifying encounter with an unhinged, nymphomaniacal pro-wrestler just for gits and shiggles, does not have such an inner life. Hopey is at her most interesting in the story “A Date with Hopey.” Told from the point of view of a character that we never see before or again, it describes the instant rapport like-minded, alienated youth feel for one another, and the mysterious way in which such instant closeness evaporates. With Hopey, evaporate is all it can do. (Maggie, saddled as she is with years spent in love with this woman, is rendered uninteresting by osmosis.) Like Daffy after that pro-wrestler flashback, we’re left wondering: Is the woman we’ve spent years (or the page-count equivalent thereof) questing after like some combination of Dulcinea and Moby Dick really just kind of a boring asshole? And has punk — along with Latino culture and professional woman’s wrestling, milieus Jaime chronicles with a great deal of self-evident passion and love — taught her anything aside from how to be professionally unpleasant, to the detriment of herself, her friends, and us readers?

A little over a year ago, before the release of Palomar and Locas rendered such questions irrelevant, I wondered where was the best place for a Love and Rockets neophyte to start reading the series. As a result I posted a thread to this publication’s Internet message board, entitled “Help me learn to like Love and Rockets.” The gist of the post was this: As a stickler for reading any given series in the chronological order of its release, I’d found myself stymied at the logical starting place, Music for Mechanics, which I’d tried and failed to get through three or four times now. My hope was that an alternate option would be proposed. Little did I expect the combination of bafflement, indignation and fury that would be aimed in the post’s direction. Though I did receive a number of considered and considerate recommendations, the general attitude displayed by the board toward those who had not already pledged allegiance to Los Bros could be likened to those T-shirts you sometimes see straightedge hardcore kids wearing, the ones that say “If you’re not now, you never were!” If I didn’t already love Love and Rockets, if I didn’t already see why it deserved its two decades of plaudits, it’s probably best if I just shut the fuck up about it. In other words, “If you’re not now, you never will be!”

I wanted to like the Maggie and Hopey stories as much as I was supposed to. I wanted to let the strength of “Tear It Up, Terry Downe” and “A Date with Hopey” and parts of “Chester Square,” “Wigwam Bam” and “The Death of Speedy Ortiz” convince me of the near-messianic value of the volume’s remaining 650 pages. But in the end, maybe Maggie, Hopey, and Jaime’s whole half of L&R are like the early gigs of the band Ape Sex that the pair reminisce over, heaping scorn on those who weren’t in attendance. Maybe you had to be there.

Music Time: George Michael – “I Want Your Sex (Freemasons Vocal Club Mix)”

George Michael

“I Want Your Sex (Freemasons Vocal Club Mix)”

Sony, September 2010

promo release, as best I can tell

Does music make you laugh? It makes me laugh a lot, and I can’t remember the last time I laughed about a song as hard as I laughed over this one. As I heard it for the first time I was just chortling, out of sheer joy. Laughing is an involuntary “hooray!” a lot of the time, a physical “right on!”, and that’s what it is in this case. Every time this ten-minute-plus dance remix of George Michael’s seminally (pun intended; it always is) direct paean to the physical pleasures of monogamy took things just a little higher, just a little further; every time it re-cut and looped together his multi-tracked vocals to say “Everybody in the ‘hood, everybody should”; every time it just repeated the word “sex!” at intervals; when it slowed down to do a full-fledged ’80s-funk remix of the song as we know it; when it added a goddamn horn section, because apparently the original was insufficiently celebratory and flamboyant; when it kicked back into the four-on-the-floor crowd-killing temp it started with…every time it did one of those things, it demonstrated a willingness to have as good a time as it possibly could at every opportunity. To go all the way, if you will. (Those familiar with Michael’s oeuvre might compare it to that crowd-goes-wild moment at the Freddie Mercury tribute concert where his band suddenly morphed the bassline from “Papa Was a Rolling Stone” into the bassline for “Killer.”) In so doing it turned a come-on into a party, a strut into a parade. Hooray! Right on! LOL!

(Via Chris Conroy.)

Carnival of souls

* Tom Spurgeon link of the day #1: Spurgeon on the 5th anniversary of the Danish Muhammad cartoons. I think that the last time I spoke about the cartoons, in the context of how that dumb fuck in Florida’s threat to burn Korans made me reassess them, I didn’t express myself clearly, so let me try again. There’s a degree to which I think art, the act of making art, is an inherent good. There’s a lesser but not insignificant degree to which I think that blaspheming is an inherent good. And there’s a degree to which I think that doing something that pisses off assholes is an inherent good. So when the Danish Muhammad cartoons came out, even though they were pretty openly a disrespectful provocation first and foremost, I thought “Yeah, okay, right on.” But when the dumb fuck in Florida threatened to burn a bunch of Korans, well, that was just a disrespectful provocation. He wasn’t an artist making art, he himself was the kind of person who’d get really upset by blasphemy if directed at the right Abrahamic religion, and he himself was an asshole. Suddenly I could the cartoons’ underlying fecklessness and nastiness was something on their own and as their own unpleasant, inadvisable things, quite aside from my feelings about art and blasphemy and asshole-baiting.

* Tom Spurgeon link of the day #2: Spurge speaks with Robot 6 guest-poster Chris Arrant on the state of comics and comics journalism. Given recent events, this struck me as the money quote, no pun intended:

Arrant: And specifically the comics journalism field — what kind of kick in the ass does it need?

Spurgeon: I think more money would be good, Chris. A bootful of cash. An ass-kicking of filthy luchre. That sounds like a jerky response, but I think if industry journalism is valued the best thing that can happen to it is that it’s supported, and that it’s supported without qualification. I’d love to be able to work an eight-hour day on CR, but I can’t afford to. I’m sure a lot of people feel the same way about writing comics articles and the like. I’m so grateful for the opportunities I do have, and I realize a lot of that is patronage rather than a cold, commercial transaction.

Tom goes on to warn people away from using comics journalism as a stepping stone to comics creation, a slap in my face personally that I will take up with him through force of arms when next we meet.

* Words I never thought I’d write: Kurt Busiek on Coober Skeber 2.

* A brief history of Ray Sohn’s True Chubbo.

Photobucket

* Whoa shit, get a load of The New York City Outlaws.

Photobucket

* Jason Adams on one of the things Tommy Lee Wallace’s It TV movie got right more or less in spite of itself.

* Well shit the bed with the lights on: Alex Timbers, director of Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson and The Pee-wee Herman Show, was in my sketch comedy group in college. He was funny!

* I got as far as this little number from Rich Juzwiak’s wall of animated gifs from Harmony Korine’s Trash Humpers before something in my brain died.

Photobucket

* Your Real Life Horror Headline of the Day: “Army ‘Kill Team’ Leader Wanted a Necklace of Fingers”

* Just to end things on an up note, may I suggest that if you have not done so recently, you listen to the first Prodigy record? It’s a scream.

Carnival of souls

* Your must-read of the day: Peggy Burns on Tom Devlin and Highwater Books. Yes, they’re married, and no, that doesn’t matter to this essay at all. Peggy writes convincingly of Highwater as comics’ introduction to the sensibilities of emo and twee indie rock, not only in aesthetic terms but as a whole business and philosophical mindset:

I think, however, what affected Highwater’s sensibility most is that Tom was the first comics publisher to directly come out of the zine/minicomic/indie-rock generation, rather than before it, like Fantagraphics, or alongside it, like D+Q. With that DIY ethos in mind, during its existence, Highwater did more with less.

She also gets points for referring to Highwater’s Free Comic Book Day giveaway as their bestselling title. The fact that I wouldn’t be where I am today if not for the existence of Highwater is an exceedingly minor entry on the list of its legacies, but it’s true. (Peggy played a pretty big role too, come to mention it.)

* Major layoffs at Vertigo. I don’t really know Joan Hilty or Jonathan Vankin, but I’ve done some freelance jobs related to several of Pornsak Pichetshote’s books and he strikes me as a guy with an editorial viewpoint worth watching. In general I just don’t like layoffs, especially not now and not in this business and not now in this business. I hope the people involved, and also anyone in similar circumstances whose departures aren’t seen as newsworthy, do well for themselves very soon.

* Rest in peace, Arthur Penn. One of my all-time favorite drug experiences was seeing Little Big Man while cataclysmically baked, a recipe for a memorable movie-watching experience if ever there was one. Every single wild tonal shift hit me like a really fast turn on the Cyclone.

* Paul Cornell is pitting Lex Luthor against Darkseid and Ra’s al-Ghul in an Action Comics annual? I did not know that. Count me among the mid-five-digit number of people who get quite excited about things like that. Also, after the Lex story is over, he’s allowed to write Superman!

* DC is publishing a Geoff Johns Flash omnibus. I’m glad about this for a couple reasons. First, I like Johns’s stuff and that’s a run I’ve been wanting to check out for ages; it seems like it could contain the seeds of the style that first made Johns click with me on his Green Lantern and Action Comics runs. Second, I think it’s good for publishers to put creators first and foremost and package runs of comics accordingly, especially given the dizzying profusion of similarly titled titles out there.

* Filing this away for later #1: Jeet Heer on Love & Rockets: New Stories #3. Can someone tell me if I need to be totally caught up on the Locas-verse to get “Browntown”? Please tell me NOTHING ELSE ABOUT THE STORY BUT THAT, if you would.

* Filing this away for later #2: Jason Adams on Monsters, the latest first-person horror jam.

* Interesting: A recap page done in comics format, assembled from previously seen panels. Also: an excuse to run Gabriel Hardman/Bettie Breitweiser Hulk art. (Via Agent M.)

Photobucket

* Today was a good day to like David Bowie, thanks to the recent release of a deluxe edition of Station to Station. Here’s Stuart Berman reviewing the set for Pitchfork; here’s Matthew Perpetua reviewing “TVC-15”; and here’s Perpetua wondering aloud if Bowie’s Klaus Nomi/Joey Arias-abetted performance on SNL was the weirdest in the show’s history. You tell me:

* I fully support the new My Chemical Romance song “Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na)”, though I’d like to state for the record that nothing touches “Teenagers.” (Via Tom Ewing.)

* Ta-Nehisi Coates reminds us of the Junior M.A.F.I.A./Jeru the Damaja player battle, which is always a good thing. Contra Coates I think “Player’s Anthem” remains phenomenal. That Biggie verse (eg. “Big Poppa never softenin’ / Take you to the church, rob the preacher for the offerin’ / Leave the fucker coughin’ up blood and his pockets like rabbit ears / Covet the wife, kleenex for the kids’ tears”) is one of my favorite verses by anyone on anything ever.


Junior mafia – player's anthem
Uploaded by dougpark17. – Watch more music videos, in HD!

* Happy blogiversary, The Cool Kids Table! Maybe Kevin will actually post something during the next two?

Comics Time: Batman: Knightfall Part One: Broken Bat

Photobucket

Batman: Knightfall Part One: Broken Bat

Chuck Dixon, Doug Moench, writers

Jim Aparo, Jim Balent, Norm Breyfogle, Graham Nolan, artists

DC, 1993

272 pages

$17.99

Buy it from Amazon.com

(Originally published on April 18, 2009 at The Savage Critic(s))

Knightfall was the big Batman event during my time as a comics reader in the early to mid ’90s. That basically means it was the big superhero comic event for me during that time. Batman was the character that got me reading comics. The first Tim Burton movie sparked my interest in the character, and The Dark Knight Returns–the first comic book I can actually remember reading–cemented it. The comic shop I went to was called Gotham Manor, for pete’s sake. And so, a multi-series crossover pitting Batman against basically his entire rogues gallery until some hulking brute takes advantage and breaks his back? Yeah, sign 9th-grade Sean Collins up. But how does it look now?

Unlike most of the straightforward superhero comics I read during that time, I actually remember Knightfall, and remember it fondly at that. This is not to say it doesn’t suffer from all the shortcomings you’d expect. The dialogue, the clothing designs, the hairstyles, especially for anyone we’re supposed to think of as “cool”…you almost wonder whether early-’90s DC writers and artists ever had any contact with the outside world at all. The book is also deep, deep in the shadow of Dark Knight, and not just in the obvious grim’n’gritty way; it occasionally serves up ersatz versions of Miller’s satire–a pop psychologist called “Dr. Simpson Flanders” hawking his book I’m Sane and So Are You! and glibly defending the rights of the escaped Arkham Asylum inmates, for example–with none of Miller’s sharpness or genuine comedic sense. Despite the overwhelming tonal debt to Miller and Burton, the character designs and color palette remain incongruously bright and buoyant. And while the newly created archvillain Bane cuts an impressive figure despite his many detractors at the time, the less said about his perfunctory posse of villain types (bird guy, knife guy, tiny brick) the better. This comic is not one of my favorites in the way that Black Hole is one of my favorites, in other words.

But! The book still somehow remains exactly what a big crazy Batman event should be. For one thing, it’s got that inner-eight-year-old appeal: What Bat-fan wouldn’t want to see Batman tangle with all his big enemies in rapid succession, with some minor ones given impressive tweaks and thrown into the mix for good measure? The very nature of Batman’s rogues gallery–75% of them spend their days right next to each other in a row of cells in Arkham Asylum, allowing both the comic and your imagination to pace the hall and peruse them like a set of action figures on the shelf–taps into a childlike desire to see a bunch of cool characters one after the other, and the story takes full advantage.

But it’s not just that Knightfall shows Batman fighting the Joker, Scarecrow, the Riddler, Killer Croc, the Mad Hatter, the Ventriloquist, Firefly, Zsasz, Poison Ivy and so on all in a row–many subsequent storylines, for both Batman (Jeph Loeb’s Hush) and other characters (Mark Millar’s Spider-Man), have gone back to that well with diminishing returns. Knightfall clicks because, as far as Batman comics go, it makes sense. If I were some criminal mastermind who wanted to take over Gotham and fuck Batman up, blowing a hole in Arkham Asylum and freeing all the crazy supervillains is exactly what I’d do. Meanwhile, if I were Batman, taking on all my crazy supervillain enemies in a row really would wear me down to the point of exhaustion. To Dixon and Moench’s credit, the labors they put Batman through are such that they emphasize the physical toll Batman’s heroic activities would have on his body. During one fight, he has to leap his way through a burning amusement park; during another he has to carry the wounded mayor through a flooded tunnel; he does an awful lot of hand-to-hand combat with guys with swords and knives or guys twice his size. And keep in mind that this is the Jim Aparo-era Batman, not a Frank Miller tank or a Jim Lee splash-page pin-up. He has a sinewy swimmer’s body that you can practically feel getting pummeled. His downfall–ahem, Knightfall–is perfectly plausible.

Then there’s the ending. Ninth-grade me wound up so upset about Bruce Wayne getting replaced that I stopped reading with that issue with the die-cut Joe Quesada cover where the new armor-clad Batman takes Bane down; the bad guy got his comeuppance, and that was enough of that for me. I’ve since managed to track down most of the KnightQuest and Knight’sEnd material that followed, and it seems to me that the mega-event couldn’t keep up the manic intensity of this opening arc. So in that sense, having Bane break Batman’s back so that a new guy could take over may not have amounted to much. But as an image? One of the highlights of the ’90s in superhero comics, certainly. Say what you will about Bane and Doomsday, but people remember them not just because of what they did (if that were so, everyone would remember all the Clone Saga bad guys too), but because of the memorable way in which they did it. And after issue after issue of histrionic overwriting, it’s how simple the end winds up being that makes Bane stick: There’s the famous splash page of Bane snapping Batman’s spine over his knee, followed by the words “Broken…and done.” After all this crazy build-up, Batman goes out like a sucker, and Bane drops him on the floor like garbage. It’s almost the opposite of the big final simultaneous punches that enabled Superman to “die” a hero. It’s appropriately more morose.

Knightfall is a book I return to often, but not to read. I flip through it, skimming a passage, checking out an image, slowly going through a sequence. The execution may often be wanting, which makes going page by page a slog, but the basic ideas are sound as a pound and a delight to light upon. When I’m in the mood for raw superhero action and thrills, there aren’t many books I like better.

Carnival of souls

* Recently on Robot 6:

* Buenaventura Press is now Pigeon Press. I think. Still, new Lisa Hanawalt, new Matt Furie!

Photobucket

* I kept forgetting to point out the comment thread on my post discussing Brian Michael Bendis’s comments regarding journalism and writing for free. Brigid Alverson, Laura Hudson, Heidi MacDonald, Tom Spurgeon, Dirk Deppey, Noah Berlatsky, J. Caleb Mozzocco, Abhay Khosla, Johanna Draper Carlson, Marc-Oliver Frisch, Alex Dueben, and Kevin Huxford are among the comics crit/journo types who weigh in.

* Digging the Craig Thompson vibe of Nick Bertozzi’s cover for his upcoming Lewis & Clark book for First Second.

Photobucket

* The good news: AdHouse is releasing a collection of Josh Cotter’s genuinely great, little-seen Send Help comic strips for the Kansas City Star, titled Barbra in the Sky with Neil Diamonds. The bad news: It’s a limited edition of 99 copies debuting at the Brooklyn Comics and Graphics Fest.

Photobucket

* Speaking of Cotter, this drawing of what looks like some horrible Transformers disaster is the kind of thing you could stare at for minutes on end.

Photobucket

* Really awful news: Sally Menke, Quentin Tarantino’s frequent editor, died a heat-related death while hiking with her dog in Los Angeles yesterday. I don’t know what it says about me that I raced through the article to see if the dog was okay, but I did. There’s an update on that score that I can’t think about too hard or I’ll cry here on the train. Anyway she was a real talent, that’s for sure.

* Here’s the trailer for the Coen Brothers’ remake of True Grit. I’ll be there. (Via Spinoff.)

* New Zealand Actors Equity appears to have joined Australia’s MEAA in advising actors not to sign on with The Hobbit until some kind of settlement has been reached, or something, this shit is totally baffling to me. The studios continue to make noise about shooting the movies elsewhere.

* Robert Kirkman says all of his comics are going to have same-day digital/print releases soon. Considering that The Walking Dead and to a slightly lesser extent Invincible are arguably the two sales success stories of comics over the past decade–they increase in sales nearly every month, something that is totally unique in all of comics–I’m really curious to see how this decision affects that.

* Trent Reznor’s Year Zero HBO miniseries is still a going concern. That’s nice. (Via Sean Belcher.)

* Greg McLean is apparently making a sequel to Wolf Creek. That’s a toughie, that movie.

* This Matt Zoller Seitz/Ian Grey debate over whether or not GoodFellas is overrated features some Breitbart-expose-of-Shirley-Sherrod-level mischaracterizations of the movie by Grey, but hey, Seitz on GoodFellas, you don’t wanna miss that. Also, even a broken clock tells the right time twice a day: Grey’s right, Casino is even better.

* Spiffy Daredevil Black and White art from David Aja.

Photobucket

* I don’t know why the heck something called the Wah Tung Matchbook Company made a bunch of mythological monster trading cards, but I sure am glad they did, and I’m glad that Monster Brains and Jacob Covery teamed up to show them to us.

Photobucket

Here’s the complete Flickr gallery.

Photobucket

* Ben Morse would like to know more about Maelstrom. And who wouldn’t?

Photobucket

* Real Life Horror: You title a post “Is It Good to Live in a Destroyed World?” and it contains not one single mention of zombie apocalypses or killer viruses or alien invasions or leather-clad mutant raiders roaming the wastelands? Dropped ball, Krugman, I don’t care how many Nobel Prizes you win.

* Mick Foley loves Tori Amos. Yes, that Mick Foley. Yes, that Tori Amos. (Via Maura Johnston.)

* Speaking of Johnston, back when I posted my list of 80 Great Tracks from the 1990s, certain persons who shall remain nameless scoffed at the inclusion of “Hobo Humpin’ Slobo Babe” by Whale, saying it was a go-nowhere one-hit-wonder. But once you’ve seen/heard the video for “Infinity Guitars” by Sleigh Bells, well, who’s hobo humpin’ now?

Music Time: Steely Dan – “Time Out of Mind”

Steely Dan

“Time Out of Mind”

from Gaucho

MCA, 1980

Buy it from Amazon.com

You know something very un-Dan is going on with this song when you hear its first verse: “Son, you better be ready for love / On this glory day / This is your chance to believe / What I’ve got to say.” Wait–this is from the record that also contains “Hey Nineteen,” right? What’s more, Donald Fagen actually sings them with something approaching, dare I say it, conviction: “You better be ready for loooooove…This is your chance to belieeeeeeeve.” This over a relatively stark instrumental backing–drums (possibly programmed), a little electric piano and bass doing basically the same thing at the same time, a tee-tiny bit of Mark Knopfler guitar–so smooth that I heard Skunk Baxter recommended it to the Defense Department as a coating for surface-to-air missiles. This song is a more or less unreconstructed good time, something to dance and have fun to, which appearances to the contrary Steely Dan did very, very rarely. I think the most direct comparison can be made with “Josie,” the song that closed out Aja and represented to the band in particular what that album represented to them in general: their artistic high point. I know they’re less keen on Gaucho but this thing’s a marvel of production as well: the beat is so crisp, and any song that all but subliminally introduces the vocals of Michael McDonald until finally you’re like “Hey, where did he come from?” is alright by me. And like “Josie,” “Time Out of Mind” sings of having a tear-the-roof-off-the-sucker good time. But my favorite thing about both songs is that Fagen and Becker can’t quite bring themselves to sing about such fun in the present or even past tense. Awesome shit’s gonna go down “when Josie comes home,” whenever that might be. In “Time Out of Mind”‘s case, good stuff is gonna happen tonight: “Tonight when I chase the dragon / The water may change to cherry wine / And the silver will turn to gold.” Various online dictionaries assure me that “chase the dragon” does not necessarily mean smoking drugs, although clearly this is far from outside the realm of possibility where the Dan is concerned, but okay, fine; what’s more interesting to me is the way Fagen appears to psych himself up into believing he’s going to catch that dragon after all. “The water may change to cherry wine”–who knows? But then “The silver will turn to gold.” Tonight for sure!

Carnival of souls

* Another big few days on Robot 6:

* Bob Harras has been named Editor-in-Chief of DC Comics, a position he previously held at Marvel. Pretty sure that’s a first. I’m also pretty sure Harras is a well-liked figure–I know I like him–even outside the traditionally effusive “congratulations to the person who just got a job wherein they could hire me someday” phase of things, and that could be a piece of the puzzle here.

* Related: On the occasion of the death of WildStorm, my fellow R6ers and I run down six awesome WildStorm titles, or as I prefer to call the list after Matt Maxwell pointed it out, “Six awesome WildStorm titles that aren’t The Winter Men.”

* Behold: The oral history of the Coober Skeber Marvel Benefit Issue, aka ground zero for alternative/superhero comics mash-ups. Oh how I love Highwater Books, the Big Star of ’00s altcomix. Make sure to check out the comment thread at the actual Comics Comics post on the topic to watch history evolve before your very eyes thanks to corrections, de-corrections, and re-corrections by the participants.

Photobucket

* J.H. Williams III talks to Robot 6 guest-poster Chris Arrant about Batwoman and making the jump to “writer-artist” in mind of readers and editors. This struck me:

Arrant: DC has recently begun encouraging more artists to write, from you to David Finch, Tony Daniel and others. You mentioned some resistance from DC earlier about you writing more. Can you expound on that resistance and how it’s changed for you?

Williams: I think so, but it hasn’t been with any real sense of maliciousness — but rather not fully understanding your players. It simplifies things to classify people for one discipline: he’s a writer, she’s an artist, and so forth. When you get individuals who can do both, there’s a perception, real or imagined, that one of those skills will be lackluster due to time constraints or just being more talented in one area than another. I’m sure there’s some truth to that — we’ve all seen artists who begin writing their own stuff and it’s not as dynamic as it could be. But at the same time, I think the industry could benefit from publishers reaching out to artists and seeing what they’re truly capable of.

Question: Between Daniel, Finch, Williams, Darwyn Cooke, and Paul Pope, what is it about the Bat-characters that makes DC that much more likely to take a flyer on writer-artists? Other than Pope and Cooke’s non-Batman/Catwoman stuff I can’t even think of another one-creator run from the company in recent memory.

* Apropos of not very much, it occurred to me the other day just how many extremely lovely looking, well-drawn monthly comics came out last week. The debut installments of Steve Epting on Fantastic Four, Gabriel Hardman on Hulk, David Aja and Michael Lark and Stefano Gaudiano on Secret Avengers…the latest issues from Charlie Adlard on The Walking Dead, Francis Manapul on The Flash, David Lafuente on Ultimate Comics Spider-Man, Rafa Sandoval on Ultimate Comics Mystery…just a lot of fine-looking books.

* The New Zealand branch of Australia’s MEAA actor’s union is spearheading a movement by SAG, AFTRA and other unions against Peter Jackson’s Hobbit movies, based on what rules would apply for Kiwi actors on the production. I confess I’m having a hard time figuring out exactly what’s going on here, but that Hollywood Reporter link (via Topless Robot) seemed pretty thorough, and Kristin Thompson’s Frodo Franchise blog has been an absolute machine on the topic. It seems that arrayed against the unions are Jackson, the studios involved, various NZ film-industry groups, and the films’ casting directors, and that the films are basically being targeted mainly as a pretext for unionizing New Zealand’s film-acting biz, heretofore a non-union shop. Jackson’s painting it as an attempt by an “Aussie bully” to muscle in on the Kiwi film industry.

* Your must-read review of the day: Craig Fischer on Geoff Grogan’s Fandancer (which was excellent).

Photobucket

* Jordan Crane’s “Unraveling” continues unraveling at What Things Do. This installment’s a doozy, with several subjects dear to my black heart.

Photobucket

* Gabrielle Bell’s San Diego Comic Con Comicumentary continues as well. I don’t think this is her intention necessarily, but I can easily see this comic being the thing fans and creators of alt/art/lit/underground comics point to when they want to explain why they’re not going to San Diego anymore, so neatly does it nail what the experience is like for certain non-nerd comics people.

Photobucket

* Eventually we’re going to have to ask Jim Woodring to stop.

Photobucket

* On a somewhat lighter note, my pal Alex Kropinak (animator extraordinaire of Marvel Super Heroes What The–?! fame) draws Captain Caveman, who as it turns out is an absolutely fascinating character to draw for some reason.

Photobucket

* I’m absolutely in love with the luminous black lines of these Disney Donald Duck posters. (Via Tom Spurgeon.)

Photobucket

* Considering that I had approximately zero interest in the subject beforehand, I found Ben Morse and Kiel Phegley’s dialogue on Smallville on the occasion of the start of its tenth (!!!) and final season absolutely fascinating. Apparently the show has had three distinct “eras” and slowly replaced almost its entire supporting cast, and last night’s season premiere featured both Brandon Routh’s costume and freaking Darkseid. But more interesting to me, as these things tend to be, is just hearing two smart, self-aware guys discuss their specific fandom.

* Pitchfork’s Ryan Dombal interviews Trent Reznor and David Fincher about the former’s score for the latter’s The Social Network. I always find it entertaining how Reznor sort of recalibrates his caustic nature toward the funny end of the spectrum for interviews.

* Speaking of, I actually have a surprisingly spotty record of seeing Fincher’s films, but I still got a lot out of the intro to Aaron Cutler’s review of The Social Network for The House Next Door in terms of how it breaks down the way Fincher has grown to deflect or defray his characters’ central pursuits over the course of his career.

* Film critic Edward Copeland rounds up a variety of august personages, including the great Matthew Zoller Seitz and (quite awesomely) actress Anne Bobby of Nightbreed fame, to reminisce about The Rocky Horror Picture Show on the occasion of its 35th anniversary. Rocky is unfuckwithable ’round these parts, and not just because I met The Missus when we were the only people at a wedding reception who knew how to do the Time Warp. Richard O’Brien’s songs–especially “Over at the Frankenstein Place,” “The Time Warp,” “Sweet Transvestite,” and “Rose Tint My World”–are absolute monsters of glam, and the audience responses still crack me up, even context free. (Some favorites: “Where the women look like cupcakes and the men have bananas on their heads,” “Only…assholes…write on doors,” “And Betsy Ross used to sit at home and sew and sew and sew and sew…,” “What do you like on your corn flakes?”) Rocky Forever.

* Weezer is re-releasing Pinkerton with fully twenty-five bonus tracks. Fourteen years ago I’d have been pretty excited about this! Today I’m just sort of irritated with Rivers. Instead of releasing 25 tracks from the Pinkerton era and touring on the Pinkerton material, how ’bout just recording new stuff of Pinkerton quality?

* The great cartoonist Jason reviews John Hillcoat’s adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s The Road and the forgotten Sam Raimi/Coen Brothers joint Crimewave. It’s wonderful to write a sentence like that.

* Dash Shaw really loves Blind Date. This sort of thing makes me wanna get off my ass and do something with my Young and the Restless fandom.

* Woof.

* Real Life Horror: President Obama would like to summarily assassinate American citizen/douchebag Anwar Awlaki…just because, legally speaking. At least I know I’m free! And here’s your comics angle for this story: Awlaki is the fuck who issued the death threat against now-in-hiding cartoonist Molly Norris.

* Something about this silly story makes me so sad. I think it’s that for most of the people who will be involved, this is the most they want out of comics.

Comics Time: Dark Reign: Zodiac

Photobucket

Dark Reign: Zodiac

Joe Casey, writer

Nathan Fox, artist

70 pages

in Dark Reign: The Underside

Marvel, 2010

256 pages

$24.99

Buy it from Amazon.com

Here’s a fun, nasty, wonderful-to-look-at comic about letting your freak flag fly, even or especially if that means murdering people. Yes, writer Joe Casey, who at this point has carved out a career in comics by dancing between other writers’ raindrops–he can afford to, since as a honcho at the studio that created Ben 10, he’s the one making it rain most of the time–is doing one of those “charismatic villain makes vaguely philosophical points about anarchy and society and shit while blowing stuff up” stories. And strangely, it works!

I think that’s because Casey keeps it so rooted in a villain-vs.-villain context, specifically the “Dark Reign” event Marvel did, in which former Green Goblin Norman Osborn assumed control of America’s defense, intelligence, and superhero infrastructure. Zodiac, who as best we can tell is just a guy in a suit with a bag over his head for a mask, sets out to be (in John McClane’s memorable description) “the fly in the ointment, the monkey in the wrench, the pain in the ass.” It’s not just that killing people represents the ultimate act of a free man in an existentialist world or something like that–it’s that seeing a one-time whackjob who rode around on a glider dressed as a goblin with a purple nightcap throwing pumpkin bombs at people suddenly become Donald Rumsfeld offends his sensibilities as a proud supervillain. That’s a way to sidestep the been-there-done-that philosopher-killer thing and bring out the fun of watching different bad guys smack each other around, something superhero comics can always do well.

It also helps that Zodiac’s design and raison d’etre owe so much to Christopher Nolan’s uber-popular Batman movies: He’s basically just Heath Ledger’s Joker dressed up like Cillian Murphy’s Scarecrow. Heck, Zodiac kicks things off by painting a sloppy smiley face on his mask (in blood, of course), and in the final issue all but quotes Ledger’s Joker: “What is being a super villain if not living a life of no rules?!” Why, he even blows up a hospital! (He also has scars, though he doesn’t ask anyone if they’d like to know how he got them.) Casey barely needs to paint in broad strokes, since we’ve already seen this particular painting. We can just revel in the Neveldine/Taylor-style grand guignol mechanics of it.

That’s where Nathan Fox comes in. Casey’s work has its adherents, but as with any writer, his stuff works best when he’s paired with a grade-A stylist. (Cf. Frazer Irving in Iron Man: The Inevitable.) Fox is certainly that. His work owes a great deal to Paul Pope’s, clearly–it takes Pope’s “What if ‘Guernica’ were a science-fiction action spectacular?” approach, dials down Pope’s Romanticism, and dials up the raw, testosterone-packed spectacle of it all. Considering how much ink is being slung around here, it’s really quite impressive how easy it is to parse both the action scenes (the Human Torch’s doomed attack on Zodiac’s goons is every bit as propulsive as a Human Torch attack ought to be) and the pacing (a scene at the Torch’s hospital bed flashes back to the attack and forth to his super hero visitors effortlessly). His character designs are a lot of fun, too: I’d imagine future Zodiac appearances will be made possible simply by Fox’s memorably rumpled take on him here, for example, while the existing heroes and villains we see–Torch, Ronin, the Wasp, Osborn’s Iron Patriot armor–stay on-model just enough for us to be able to appreciate the way Fox coaxes out the weirdness and aggressiveness of their original designs.

I also want to draw special attention to the colors of Jose Villarubia. It’s not just that they’re bright, buoyant, and practically glow off the page, particularly any time fire or explosions are required (which is often). It’s that flipping through the comic once again just now reveals an overall scheme at work: The heroes, represented by the Fantastic Four, usually appear in a world of blue, while Norman Osborn is red–as are the Torch and the giant robot Zodiac uses as a decoy at one point, i.e. the characters who engage in direct physical combat. Against these primary colors stands Zodiac, a dark and dingy brown and gray presence who eventually, for reasons I won’t spoil but which have to do with Marvel continuity minutiae so they’re probably not spoilerable anyway, glows with a sickly green. You don’t have to have read very many Vertigo comics to understand that that palette is supposed to represent edgy, grown-up concerns–it’s a simultaneous salute to and parody of Zodiac’s self-conception as the superior force to the brightly colored heroism and law’n’order ass-kicking represented by the prevailing order of heroes and villains. Which is something we’ve seen before, a lot, to be sure. But it’s fun to see again in this case, and fun is what matters.

Carnival of souls

* Must-read of the week: Tom Spurgeon’s twelve questions about DC’s announcements this week. It’s well-sourced and wide-ranging: theorizing that the announcements were staggered the way they were to dull the impact of the negative stuff; wondering if the attitudes of the respective areas’ circuit courts toward IP issues might have played a part; musing on the start-to-finish history of the DC/WildStorm relationship; including direct follow-ups with DC President Diane Nelson and the LA Times reporter who said 20% of the DC workforce would be laid off. This was my favorite part, which I hope he won’t mind my quoting in its entirety:

7. How Horrible Must It Have Been To Be A DC Comics Employee This Week — Heck, This Year?


One thing that’s been to my mind under-reported is how the lengthy period preceding Tuesday’s announcements must have had an effect on those that now must deal with the collective outcome of those decisions. Despite R. Fiore’s post-announcement assertion that the rumors of a total west coast move were only that because such a move made no sense, Diane Nelson has clearly acknowledged that such a move was on the table and considered, and the pervasiveness and certainty of the rumor was as ingrained in the day to day reality of its believers as any I’ve ever seen in comics. This was not a case of a few bloggers running around screaming things just to be heard. 


So, if you’re a DC employee, it’s possible you just spent several months thinking you might lose your job — a comics job! — in a shitty economy or have to move to California and away from your friends with an unknown incentive package, or none at all, as the basis for making this possible. This was followed by a couple of weeks just past where you were told that an announcement was imminent. This may have been followed by a moment of relief — that’s how it was described to me — when the New York publishing offices were announced as staying open. And yet this was followed by word that divisions are being closed, which was followed by further news that everyone is being evaluated — with firings on the table. 


Now, I don’t know if that’s a fully accurate view of the timeline, but if half of that stuff happened to me, if I rode on the first two plunges of that particular roller coaster, my morale would be at the sub-basement level. One can argue that DC Comics isn’t exactly a healthy culture to begin with; one can further argue that it’s been a particularly difficult place to work for the last few years. I can’t imagine what an injection of real drama might do to that group’s collective ability to function at the high level required of them by current industry circumstance.

* Meanwhile, up to 80 employees will be moved or let go, according to a filing made by Warner Bros. That number equates to about a third of the DC workforce, but as the comment-thread discussion–which involves myself, Chris Butcher, and Kurt Busiek among others–should make clear, it’s not at all clear how that will break down between “moves” and “layoffs.”

* On any other day, in any other week really, this would have been the big story: The Walking Dead has begun simultaneous print and digital release. The price point for each is the same.

* Over at Robot 6, I dashed off a few thoughts on Brian Michael Bendis’s ongoing commentary on the state of comics journalism and criticism. This time I focused on whether or not longform journalism is something you can do for free or not.

* It was only when reading the announcement that Clive Barker is developing an action-thriller called Resurrection Man that I realized there are fully three Barker-authorized adaptations I haven’t seen yet: Midnight Meat Train, Dread, and Book of Blood. Pretty sad.

* Holy god look at how stupidly attractive this Sally Bloodbath/Matt Wiegle comic is.

Photobucket

* And speaking of Wiegle, he brings us word of this scary Norse ghost by Marshall Arisman:

Photobucket

* Here’s a fine Tom Ewing piece on Soul II Soul’s “Back to Life (However Do You Want Me).” It’s really quite something how much of the next decade of music that one song presaged. And the first comment from Punctum is quite something, too.

* Cartoonist Jesse Moynihan on Murakami, Lost Highway, and seeing his ex-girlfriend after a disastrous break-up. How often is a blog post moving?

* I love pointless blasphemy.

* Bruleception. Ride the krick back up the layers with Dr. Steve, won’t you?

Comics Time: The Whale

Photobucket

The Whale

Aidan Koch, writer/artist

Gaze Books, September 2010

64 pages

$10

Buy it from Gaze

If his own Xeric Grant-funded book Young Lions and this inaugural release for his Gaze Books imprint are any indication, cartoonist and newly minted publisher Blaise Larmee could certainly do a lot worse than cranking out tastefully designed, inexpensive perfectbound softcover books with brightly colored covers containing softly pencilled, elliptically plotted comics about longing for however long he feels like doing so. Even with all the vitality artcomix has right now, this is an underserved aesthetic, overwhelmed by inkslingers whose work tends to be either tighter and angrier or choppier and wilder. I’d imagine that this material is going to click hard with a group of people who just aren’t getting the comics that might speak to them elsewhere.

I’m not sure how hard it clicked for me, for whatever that’s worth, despite it being a really lovely comic I’m glad I read. In a weird way the lettering, of all things, gives the game away in terms of why this story, of a young woman coming to terms with the death of her partner (whose gender is unclear, and unimportant), didn’t hit me the way it might have. (Or the way Anders Nilsen’s comics on this topic, for example, actually did.) Stick with me for a minute here: Koch draws like a slightly beefed-up version of Larmee–her sensuous, slightly tremulant line shored up by more detailed and realistic figurework and portraiture and a more frequent, textural use of light and dark grays. She has a knack for using filmic techniques like eyeline matches–between her main character and her tiny, adorable dog, to name one memorable example–to make panel transitions pop. And many of those panels are strikingly, intelligently composed: I’m fond of a splash page of boats along a dock at the bottom of the page, the water filling the rest of the page with just a few suggestions of waves and ripples, which echoes a similar “shot” of our protagonist’s bare feet protruding from the bottom of the page as she looks down at a rug partially covered with boxes of her late loved one’s possessions. We get bird’s eye views, seal’s eye views, close-ups, panoramas, and through it all the sense that we’re not just seeing some figures move back and forth in tiny boxes someone drew, but that we’re in a world someone inhabits, and which that someone colors and contours with her emotions and thoughts. It’s confident comics-making.

Then there’s that lettering. It’s not unpleasant, don’t get me wrong–nice simple all-caps block hand-lettering, in pencil, slanting slightly forward. It’s just that relative to the size and tone of the drawings, it’s a bit overwhelming. The handwriting might obscure that everything’s being said IN ALL-CAPS ITAL, but that’s what it is, and it wrings a lot of the nuance and quietness out of the emotional content of the words. This in turn draws attention to how several of the story’s beats are, if not cliches, then at least familiar to anyone with a passing knowledge of the literature of loss. Boxing up their stuff, grabbing/being grabbed by certain memorable possessions; survivor’s guilt (“THEY SAID I WAS THE LUCKY ONE“); the soothing and saddening presence of the sea; the fairly on-the-nose metaphor to which the title refers, and so on. It’s grief in all-caps ital, if you will.

This, perhaps, is a weakness of this style: losing sight of the fact that feeling something intensely is, in itself, value neutral. How you express it counts more than that you express it. There’s one genuinely moving bit here where that’s clear: The protagonist calls for her dog, and the second time she does so her word balloon has suddenly sprouted another tail, pointing to a ghostly figure who once would have done the same. It’s a killer detail, unexpected and immediately powerful. It’s worth more than any all-caps emotion.

Carnival of souls

* Today on Robot 6: Ivan Brunetti covers Strange Tales II (look, it’s Ivan Brunetti’s Nova!!!!);

Photobucket

* Becky Cloonan draws Grant Morrison;

Photobucket

* and Brian Michael Bendis hates the comics blogosphere.

* In case it wasn’t clear from yesterday’s link, that David Bordwell piece on the formulation of the idea of “classical Hollywood cinema” as (essentially) a school of moviemaking wasn’t just a blog post, but an introduction to this massive, delightful essay by Bordwell, Janet Staiger, and Kristin Thompson on the 25th anniversary of their book The Classical Hollywood Cinema. Tons of stuff that put a smile on my ex-film-student face in there, and not just the shoutout to my old professor Charlie Musser. Here’s Bordwell:

…literary academics often argue about terminology, insisting that the choice of a single word reveals deep things about an author’s conceptual commitments and biases. Perhaps this is one reason the literary humanities make so little progress in producing reliable knowledge.

Here’s Staiger:

I find symptomatic criticism (finding subtexts of race, sex, sexual, and class ideologies within films) a valuable critical project because I believe that many people see such ideologies while watching films. However, I also believe that Neoformalism has the greatest critical scope for describing and analyzing works of art.

Dig in!

* And now it’s Tim Hodler’s turn to weigh in on Douglas Wolk.

* Here, let me post that Anders Nilsen poster for the Brooklyn Comics and Graphics Fest at a less tiny size.

Photobucket

* Josh Cotter returns…?

Photobucket

* Y’know, reading Ron Rege Jr.’s Yeast Hoist #4 on What Things Do makes Frank Santoro’s argument that they just ain’t makin’ minicomics like they used to a lot more persuasuive.

Photobucket

* Scott Campbell gets that Barton Fink feeling. (Via Nate Patrin.)

Photobucket

* I liked my friend Kennyb’s take on Underworld’s music in general and their new album’s standout track “Scribble” in particular a great deal.

* Mallory’s Clothes, a tumblr dedicated to nothing but posting pictures of every single outfit worn by Mallory on Family Ties? Sure, I’ll eat it. It’s a fine document of the days when tens of thousands of Vampire Weekend cover models roamed the American plains in huge hordes. (Via Matthew Perpetua.)

Photobucket

Music Time: The Walkmen – Lisbon

The Walkmen

Lisbon

Fat Possum, September 14, 2010

Buy it from Fat Possum

Buy it from Amazon.com

There’s a lot I could say about the Walkmen, a band I liked for their first album, then fell for hard for their second, then fell away from for their third onward. I could say that singer Hamilton Leithauser’s tendon-straining shouting and arrhythmic delivery totally undo the music-for-grown-ups restraint and professionalism the band’s spent the last few years dealing in, which in turn strikes me as too polite for the “stranded and starry-eyed” stumblebum charm it’s clearly aiming for. I could say that the way Leithauser’s vocals are recorded, as though they’ve been thrown atop the music like a towel hanging out of a hamper, also emphasizes the lack of memorable hooks and melodies the band’s come up with in recent years. I could say that the frequently tinny mix really doesn’t mesh with the drunken physicality you ought to get out of a band doing the rueful bards of the bar scene thing. I could admit that for all this I’m still intrigued by aspects of their work–the ongoing fixation with Christmas/New Year’s/winter, for example, or their “if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again” approach to incorporating a horn section. But I really just want to ask: Once you’ve discovered that you can sound like a barfight…


Walkmen – The Rat

…why settle for sounding like shuffling home after last call, over and over and over? Yes, that’s a special feeling, worth capturing, but if it’s always last call, it’s never really last call at all, right?

“Levels.”

I really, really, really, really, really don’t like going to a movie mentally prepared to wedge myself against or behind conventional wisdom about that movie. I like writing about movies with that sort of thing in mind even less. But for once, in seeing Christopher Nolan’s much-lauded, much-backlashed Inception a couple months after it first came to dominate the pop-culture conversation, all that business had me in the perfect place as a viewer. I knew a lot of people loved it. I knew a lot of people, especially people whose taste I trusted, thought the emperor was, if not naked, then at least in his PJs. I knew I have a tendency to disagree with the people I trust. I knew I have a tendency to like Christopher Nolan movies even less than they do. And so I went in with not high expectations, not low expectations, not no expectations, but simply expectations. I expected it to be a fun time at the movies. And that’s what it was.

One thing I enjoyed to a degree that surprised me even in the moment was the young, or at least young-looking, cast. Starring as Dom Cobb, an expert dream-thief pulling One Last Job so that he can buy himself back into a life he was forced to leave behind for reasons to do with the death of his wife, Leonardo DiCaprio brings that same aging-babyface sourness he brings to all the parts he plays in this stage of his career. He looks like someone who’s aged more in mind than in body and the pieces just don’t fit together; his physicality has the rage and regret of someone who’s still living in his parents’ basement during his ten-year college reunion. Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Ellen Page look like they’re in grad school and college respectively; Tom Hardy looks like he just got back into town after blowing his trust fund. Put it all together and you’ve got a core group of stars who look, perhaps, like you looked when you first realized you were good at a certain thing, learned to respect yourself for it, and learned to expect respect from others for it. It’s a much more exciting set of casting choices than the umpteenth “band of grizzled operatives gets together for one last score” flick of the year.

I also dug the confidence with which Nolan draws us into the world he’s created–echoed, perhaps, by the mechanics of Extraction and Inception themselves, in which operatives create a dream world then basically knock their targets in and out of it with them. The technological advances that allow for this are cursorily addressed, mostly I’d imagine to head off questions from the sorts of viewers who would demand those answers, but for the most part you’re just rolling with it like this was the un-whimsical version of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. True, the worlds these dreams create are surprisingly straightforward, maybe even disappointingly so–most of that cool-looking zero-gravity stuff you see in the commercials really is just run-of-the-mill bodies in free fall, and aside from some perfunctory M.C. Escher staircases there’s very little reality-warping of the sort you saw in the movie’s print and billboard ads. But while they don’t look wild, or particularly dreamlike, they do look nice, like cool places to chase and be chased. The worlds constructed by Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s character Arthur in particular come across like the Gordon Willis World Theme Park. And all of them make a fine, sumptuous home for Hans Zimmer’s subconscious hum of a score–it’s leagues beyond the almost aggressively forgettable stuff (the Joker’s cues excepted) he turned in for Nolan’s two Batman movies. (Batman movies without theme music! I still can’t get over it!)

And pacing-wise, Inception is crackerjack stuff. Nolan constructs a scenario that at one point had no fewer than five simultaneous countdowns built into it, each level of which had a crystal-clear entry and exit point for viewer and character alike. After seeing the mushy, nonsensical Expendables or the hero’s-journey-by-numbers Clash of the Titans remake, I can’t tell you what a relief it was simply to see an action-movie blockbuster where the directors and the characters clearly knew what they were doing and why they were doing it, let alone where all did it with such aplomb. (Iron Man 2 doesn’t count–it was basically banter interrupted with the occasional armor fight.)

Problems, you ask? Oh, for sure. It’s a damn good thing the structure was so propulsive, because Nolan again shows himself to be perhaps the least skilled director of action to have somehow forged a career making action movies. Chases through city streets–on foot in Mombasa, by car in Los Angeles–are flabbily edited, blurry, context-free messes, everything that everyone complained about, wrongly, in the rigorously, gloriously shot and choreographed Bourne action sequences. Later sequences involving sniper rifles and sneak-and-shoot maneuvers are stronger, mostly because quickly becomes clear that in terms of staging Nolan is relying almost entirely on the viewer’s sense-memories of first-person shooters. The film’s biggest setpiece, the storming of a snowbound fortress, feels so much like a level from GoldenEye or Call of Duty that I found myself imagining what buttons I would have had to press for each character to do what they were doing. (Sidenote: As best I can tell, the entire snow sequence tell was mercifully and wisely left out of any trailers or commercials; it was nice for it to come as a surprise all these weeks later.)

What’s funny is that the film also contains a…well, not a knockout, it didn’t light my world on fire like (say) the Darth Maul duel in Phantom Menace or the subway fight in The Matrix did, but the zero-gravity fight between Gordon-Levitt and various subconscious-security goons in the hotel hallway was quite strong. It’s the one action sequence in the film, if not Nolan’s entire career, where he just let the camera record the movement of bodies through space and the physical consequences of their actions without all the shake’n’bake smash’n’grab slice’n’dice. Clearly he knew he had something special here, and thus got out of the way of it; why didn’t he realize how much stronger that made it, and apply that technique to everything else?

Nolan’s also an enormously dour and sexless filmmaker. I laughed a grand total of twice during the entire film, which let’s be clear is not some exploration of soul-crushing sadness, it’s a sci-fi heist picture–once at the kiss Gordon-Levitt’s character steals from Ellen Page’s, and once because I thought, and thanks to the way Nolan shoots action I’m still not sure, the Chemist was flipping his pursuers the bird as his van plummeted off the bridge. The movie feels like one of the very classy brown suits the characters favor, rich and stiff. And forget feeling any kind of sexual chemistry between any of the characters (beyond my own budding crush on Tom Hardy, perhaps)–Nolan’s films are David Lynch for squares.

It’s also surprisingly emotionally flat. Over and over we are told how dangerously attached Cobb is to his memories of Marillon Cotillard’s incomprehensibly named character (Maude? Moll? Mauve? Maume?), but their final confrontation is simply a repetition, in some cases a literal one, of their previous scenes together–including one endless recitation of their history by DiCaprio to Page that grinds the film to a fault halfway through. Only Cobb’s believably blasphemous reaction to his wife’s suicide cuts through the fog of stylized regret that hangs over this supposedly pivotal relationship. Particularly compared to the relationships that formed the core of two films to which Inception is frequently compared, Lynch’s Mullholland Drive and Martin Scorsese’s Shutter Island, the Cobb/Mal (I looked it up) amour fou wants for intimacy, heat, and in the end, genuine, frightening grief and loss. Other than DiCaprio’s cry for his suicided wife, the only emotional beat I really bought, ironically enough, was Cillian Murphy’s wide-eyed, wordless reaction to his fake father’s fake last words.

And then there are the usual Nolanisms: gaping plot holes (Fisher, who we learn has been trained to guard against Extraction and thus surely must be on the lookout for suspicious stuff, didn’t notice that his company’s chief competitor was flying in the same first-class cabin he’d be napping in for hours at a time on the way to his magnate father’s funeral?), hugely predictable “revelations” (the second Cobb told Saito he’d done Inception before, I knew whom he’d done it to), softball-hanging-over-the-plate “thought-provoking” stuff (wAs It aLL a DrEaM???). And of course it’s another movie about angry men in suits that only passes the Bechdel Test if you’re grading on a serious curve.

But it’s also stylish, fun, pretty to look at, crisply plotted, generally exciting. The entirety of the film gives you less to think about than the Winkie’s dream sequence in Mulholland Drive alone, but whaddayagonnado? I’ll tell you what I’m gonna do: I’m going to be happy to have enjoyed myself and call it a night. One of the great things about being a grown-up is that you don’t need Inception to decide to approach a given work of art precisely the way you want.

Carnival of souls

* The DC Entertainment restructuring story from yesterday continues to develop–internally as well as externally, I might add. For now, here’s Kiel Phegley talking to Dan Didio and Jim Lee about the moves, and Kevin Melrose with a roundup of the developments and reaction to them, the most helpful such post I’ve seen so far. The big question today is the provenance of the LA Times’ much-quoted figure of 20% layoffs for the company, a figure that didn’t, uh, figure into any of the other press the company heads did yesterday.

* The lineup for the second annual Brooklyn Comics and Graphics Fest has been announced, and it’s a killer, including ultra-rare East Coast appearances by Jordan Crane and Johnny Ryan. Paul Pope’s joining the fold this year too. Plus, dig the Anders Nilsen poster.

Photobucket

* Knockout installment of Brian Chippendale’s Puke Force today. You definitely wanna click the link to see this thing at full size.

Photobucket

* I wonder what Kevin Huizenga’s Glenn Ganges is up to here. Smells like adventure to me!

Photobucket

* Wow, Theo Ellsworth makes a great album-cover artist. This Flying Lotus cover he did is on some serious King Crimson/Gentle Giant shit.

Photobucket

* Jeet Heer on Douglas Wolk on comics. Go, read.

* And while you’re there, check out the voluminous comment thread for Frank Santoro’s post on SPX and the slow death of the minicomic. Frank’s taking no prisoners, and there are tons of compelling responses from Dan Nadel, Rob Clough, Brian Chippendale, MK Reed, James Kochalka, Tom Spurgeon, Matt Seneca, Jason Overby, and on and on.

* Fascinating David Bordwell Post of the Week: Bordwell on the evolution of the idea of classical Hollywood cinema as a school of filmmaking.

Not Comics Time: Scary Stories Treasury

Photobucket

Scary Stories Treasury

Alvin Schwartz, writer

Stephen Gammell, artist

HarperCollins, 1995

115 pages, hardcover

$9.95

Buy it from Amazon.com

It was a red-letter day when I snagged this omnibus edition of the three collections of scary stories from folklore assembled and retold by Alvin Schwartz and illustrated by Stephen Gammell: 1981’s Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark, 1984’s More Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark, and 1991’s Scary Stories 3: More Tales to Chill Your Bones. Honestly, I could skip this review and just post the collection of Gammell’s world-beating brain-searing images I gathered up from the Internet, and any point I’d have tried to make would probably be made at least as effectively. If you ever came across these books as a kid, you probably, and this is no joke, remember some of these illustrations better than the faces of your best friends. Like a proto-Al Columbia, veteran illustrator and Caldecott Medal winner Gammell found a way to depict a kind of evil that seems to have seeped into and corrupted those depictions themselves. Instead of deconstructing these images like Columbia does–using sketches, abandoned work, damaged or destroyed pages and so on to suggest that these things almost too horrible to truly commit to paper–Gammell uses washed-out black and gray inks to suggest forms slowly coalescing into being from…someplace else, someplace we can’t fully see and wouldn’t want to. On the memorable occasions when he comes right out and draws these things where you can’t help but look at them, and seemingly they at you, it can quite literally be difficult to sustain that gaze. I defy you to stare at this image, for example–astutely chosen as this omnibus collection’s cover; no effing around here!–without eventually just shaking your head and saying “Jesus.”

Photobucket

But Gammell is equally adept, and just as haunting, when he’s not depicting anything in particular. In a few memorable pieces–sometimes in illustrations for the front matter, sometimes for the stories themselves–he goes full-on black-psychedelic, creating images that suggest surrealism but which replace the traditional visual punning of that movement with disconcertingly decontextualized tendrils and splatters and parts of leering, screaming faces. My favorite of these is the below illustration, for the story “Oh, Susannah!”

Photobucket

Which leads me to the storyteller, Alvin Schwartz. A folklorist with dozens of collections under his belt, Schwartz displays here what I imagine to be a hugely underrated and underremembered proficiency with his prose. These are books for children and young adults, but Schwartz uses that to his advantage. In his best moments, he takes the economical prose typically used to communicate to these age groups–that “So-and-so was a person and this is what happened to him” factuality–and employs it to tell stories of not just the unexplained, but the unexplainable. Again, “Oh, Susannah!” is my favorite. A college student names Susannah comes home late at night and tries to go to sleep, only to be awoken by her roommate, already in bed, singing the old Stephen Foster song. When she switches on the light to confront the roommate, she discovers that the roommate’s head is missing. The story ends with Susannah telling herself “I’m having a nightmare. When I wake up, everything will be all right….” Who murdered the roommate? How long ago did it happen? If the roommate is dead, who was singing the song? Is Susannah having a nightmare? Will everything be all right? What does any of this have to do with the cosmic hellscape with which Gammell has adorned this story? We don’t know, and Schwartz’s all-business prose offers us no comforting room for interpretation. It is what it is, and what it is is horrifying.

Photobucket

Schwartz’s technique can make even the collections’ most familiar stories freshly disturbing. Consider his take on the old “the call is coming from inside the house” urban legend that gave rise to When a Stranger Calls. Here’s how he ends it:

Just then a door upstairs opened. A man they had never seen before started down the stairs toward them. As they ran from the house, he was smiling in a very strange way. A few minutes later, the police found him there and arrested him.

As adults, we know what might cause a stranger who’s spent the evening hiding in a house, menacing a babysitter and the three little children she’s been watching, to smile in a very strange way. Indeed, Schwartz states repeatedly, in introductions to the volumes and chapters and in the notes and sources sections at the back of each volume, that scary stories about the non-supernatural are a way for young people to warn each other of the dangers the real world contains once they leave the protection of their parents–a homeopathic remedy for all-too-real fears, if you will. But within the context of the story itself, the man’s motives and bizarre behavior–that strange smile, his apparent lingering long enough for the police to “find him there and arrest him”–is a mystery, both tantalizing and repellent. It’s up to the young reader to fill in the blanks, and nothing good’s going in them.

Photobucket

But it’s also worth noting that Gammell and Schwartz display a sly sense of humor in a lot of their work here as well, befitting the funny-scary tone of a lot of these summer-camp and tall-tale-derived stories. I’m thinking of the subtly grinning alligator with the human hand who accompanies a story of shapeshifting swimming fanatics that ends with the sentence “Everybody knows there aren’t any alligators around here.” Or of the juxtaposition of the extravagantly bloody, elegantly gesturing hand that accompanies “The Ghost with the Bloody Fingers” with the downright goofy story itself, which ends with a guitar-playing hippie obliviously telling the sanguine specter to “Cool it, man! Get yourself a Band-Aid.” This stuff works as a relief valve for the out-and-out scary stuff, obviously. But it also shows just how deft both writer and artist are in treading that liminal area–between funny-weird and funny-haha, between fact and fiction, between popcorn-spilling scary and afraid to get up and go to the bathroom at night scary–where all these folk tales dwell.

One last thing: Schwartz comes up with the best titles! Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark itself is brilliantly matter-of-fact, but the section and story titles really get good in vol. 2: “When She Saw Him, She Screamed and Ran,” “Something Was Wrong,” “A Weird Blue Light,” “Somebody Fell from Aloft,” “She Was Spittin’ and Yowlin’ Just Like a Cat,” “When I Wake Up, Everything Will Be All Right”…More Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark is the best collection of titles this side of early Gang of Four–just one more delight to be found in this treasure of a book.

Photobucket