Carnival of souls

* I’ve frequently talked about how much I loved, and love, He-Man and the Masters of the Universe–the prototype for the genre-mashup “art of enthusiasm” I enjoy so much today. El Mayimbe at Latino Review has a lengthy synopsis of a draft screenplay for a new film adaptation of the franchise by Justin “The New David Goyer” Marks. On the one hand, Mayimbe says:

It’s a hard and edgy PG-13 tinkering on [sic] a [sic] R. The script has ZERO CAMP or CHEESINESS. NO FUCKING ORKO EITHER! The writer takes the MOTU mythology very seriously. Whatever made the cartoon corny is not in here at all. In fact, there is not a single beat of comedic relief [sic] in the script.

Which, you know, barf. God forbid we don’t take a franchise that featured a half-skunk half-man named Stinkor seriously!^ However, it’s possible that to translate the awesome-(in the awe-provoking sense)-to-a-five-year-old quality of the original toys and cartoons to a modern blockbuster audience, you have to jump into the madness of it all with both feet; winks and nods toward admitting the original was goofy may just lead to a a watered-down G.I. Joe-style attempt to flatten the weirdness into a conventional action-flick mold. The screenplay sounds fun enough, ripping off Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings films (right down to an “in ancient times” prologue nominated by a powerful woman from the film’s present) and the superhero-in-training movies of today just as unabashedly as the old He-Man stuff ripped off Heavy Metal and D&D, which is probably as it should be. And the He-Man world’s po-faced mixture of fantasy and science-fiction is apparently a very big deal to Marks. So we’ll see. (Via AICN.)

* A good day for rants, part one: Ken Lowery bemoans Hollywood’s perennial failure to follow up for-women smashes like Sex and the City with more movies for women. Romantic comedies–which my mother calls “sappy crappies”–don’t count.

* Curt Purcell responds to CRwM’s epic series on torture porn, defending the “High Horrorism” of supernatural horror and arguing that fusty Victorian/Edwardian notions of dread actually date back to prehistoric, even primordial times. It’s a great post, though I want to add two things: 1) I don’t think CRwM went nearly as far in the “supernatural horror sucks because it’s too unrealistic” direction as Aaron Weisbrod’s old Dark But Shining essay on that notion, and good on CRwM for that; 2) the comment thread at Curt’s post is the usual roundelay of pro forma, largely baseless responses to the torture porn issue (they suck; they’re just slasher movies but not as cool; the term “torture porn” is insulting to the horror genre) that Curt and CRwM’s posts on the topic have commendably avoided.

* A good day for rants, part two: Look, I’ve got a lot of problems with the superhero movie wave of the past few years, including (heck, especially!) the supposedly good flicks, let alone the real dreck. Even so, I found Chris Nashawaty’s anti-superhero-movie piece at EW to be perhaps the most sloppily researched and argued genre-entertainment thinkpiece it’s been my misfortune to come across in literally years. You truly have to read it to believe it–it’s so bad I don’t even know where to begin.^^ Fortunately I don’t have to: My pal Zach Oat at Movies Without Pity takes a chainsaw to Nashawatay’s strawman arguments, factual distortions, generally abysmal critical judgment, and sucker-punching of Stan Lee. (The Man is a complicated figure in comics history who has a lot of things to answer for; churning out drab, cookie-cutter ideas during his ’60s-era heyday is most certainly not one of them.)

^ Do no fanboys realize that hating Orko, Snarf, the Ewoks, et cetera because they make fucking He-Man, Thundercats, Star Wars, et cetera too silly is ridiculous beyond comprehension? Have they never watched the rest of He-Man, the Thundercats, Star Wars, et cetera?

^^ Okay, that’s not quite true: Anyone who apparently loves Independence Day forfeits their right to complain about X-Men: The Last Stand. Or, really, anything else.

6 Responses to Carnival of souls

  1. Nick says:

    Did that Nashawaty guy really favorably compare freaking “Octopussy” to a summer full of Superhero movies? “Octopussy”? Really? So he’d rather have a bad James Bond movie over, say, “Iron Man”?

  2. Ken Lowery says:

    The writer takes the MOTU mythology very seriously.

    This is the point at which I disconnect.

  3. crwm says:

    Thanks for pointing out that I am not against non-naturalistic horror. Regulars on the site know I’m a Lovecraft fan and my favorite horror film of all time is “Creature of the Black Lagoon” – I saw it sitting on my living room floor wearing completely non-functional 3D glasses that the local 7-11 gave away. That experience changed my life.

    Anyway, two points.

    +1 for using the word “roundelay”

    and . . .

    Does anybody else hope that the MOTU movie has a post-credits sequence that has He-Man show up and say, “Today’s adventure was pretty exciting. But we also learned not to put butter on the cat. It seems like fun, but don’t do it.”

  4. Sean says:

    Nick: Aye, that he did. It’s sort of amazing he was actually able to finish some of those arguments–you’d think they’d collapse under their own weight almost instantly.

    Ken: I hear you. Sheesh.

    CRwM: No problem, thanks, and you bet!

  5. Nick says:

    But… Octopussy?

    Quick comment on Supernatural Horror:

    I don’t know, Supernatural Horror scares me. Sometimes. I’m a pastor and I believe demon possession happens. There is a certain supernatural element to life sometimes. Or you may disagree that’s, totally up to you.

  6. Dan Coyle says:

    Without camp or cheesiness, what does He-Man have? Even the relatively serious 1987 live actioner had moments of levity, and some boss overacting.

    Then again, I like the live action He-Man. Quite a bit.

Comments are closed.