Carnival of souls

* Just a couple more thoughts about the passing of Bea Arthur: The Golden Girls‘ Dorothy Zbornak is one of the all-time great sitcom characters. Her staunch, iconoclastic personal and political progressivism undercut by her actual lived experience, she was easily embarrassed by her own mistakes and shortcomings but never less than passionately proud of the person she had become–and her potential to become something even more–despite them. Her ability to acknowledge her flaws but power past them made her the perfect foil for Rose’s naivete, Blanch’s narcissism, and Sofia’s provincialism, all of which she parried with her own trademark characteristic: bullshit-deflating sarcasm. As The Missus put it last night while we were discussing Dorothy, “They took the ‘straight-man’ character and made her funny.'” It was a brilliant maneuver brilliantly handled by Arthur, and I don’t think any sitcom has done it as deftly. There’s more value in a single Bea Arthur Golden Girls reaction shot than in entire episodes of How I Met Your Mother. She was the real deal.

* Mark Waid names names (Levitz, Ross, Jemas, Alessi, DiDio) in this uproariously candid interview with AICN. At this point Waid’s been off the reservation so long I’m not sure he remembers where it was, but even so, these kinds of comments still offer the frisson of on-the-record smacktalking in an sub-industry whose professional class rarely indulges in that sort of thing:

The biggest challenge [of working on 52] was actually, wisely, kept from us by Steve [Wacker, the series’ editor]. EIC Dan Didio, who first championed the concept, hated what we were doing. H-A-T-E-D 52. Would storm up and down the halls telling everyone how much he hated it. And Steve, God bless him, kept us out of the loop on that particular drama. [Subsequent editor Michael] Siglain, having less seniority, was less able to do so, and there’s one issue of 52 near the end that was written almost totally by Dan and Keith Giffen because none of the writers could plot it to Dan’s satisfaction. Which was and is his prerogative as EIC, but man, there’s little more demoralizing than taking the ball down to the one-yard line and then being benched by the guy who kept referring to COUNTDOWN as “52 done right.”

Place your bets on which issue that was. I’ve got a hunch myself.

* Related, in some ineffable way: Tom Spurgeon on how the direct market depends on the buying habits of a small group of big spenders whose spending might be getting less big.

* Also vaguely related, by way of contrast: Tom Spurgeon (again) on the 10 Best Long-Running Comics Series of All Time. A tough list to argue with, especially when you factor in his runners-up. Mostly, as always, it’s just a pleasure to read a long post in which Tom holds forth about a variety of different kinds of comics in short order.

* I feel like this is related too, somehow: Dan Nadel mulls over the life and career of Rocketeer creator and Bettie Page cultural archaeologist Dave Stevens. Dan’s read of Stevens’s aborted autobiography-cum-art book is that Stevens died disappointed that his output failed to live up to his ambitions; Dan then argues that those ambitions were inherently proscribed by Stevens’s own artistic and aesthetic self-limitations, primarily driven by nostalgia for an outmoded illustration tradition, and further, that those limitations were ignored and their ramifications actively celebrated by Stevens’s subcultural fellow travelers. It’s a depressing series of thoughts. But you know what? I still see it playing out today. Creators who act as though they know better continue to play squarely within the aesthetic and financial playing field of the direct market’s clients, despite any number of other options available at this point in the medium’s history. And new order cutoffs be damned, Previews will still be crammed full of work by writers and artists who you just wish would take their brains and think bigger thoughts with them.

* Also also related: Chris Butcher liveblogs the April Previews. Headscratching and hilarity ensues.

* The final vaguely related link: Curt Purcells reviews Douglas Wolk’s Reading Comics from the perspective of someone who enjoys reading comics but finds himself so baffled by their current state that he can’t honestly refer to himself as a fan.

* Monster Brains previews Johnny Ryan’s upcoming non-stop-action comic Prison Pit.

* They’re remaking Videodrome. Oddly, I’m…kind of intrigued by the prospect of a thoroughly Hollywoodized versions of David Cronenberg’s orificetravaganza. The world could use a little more high-gloss perversion.

* Robert Rodriguez talks to AICN about the Predator sequel he’s allegedly producing, Predators. I’ll believe it when I see it, as I say. I hope it contains the words “get to the chopper” in some configuration if and when it gets made.

* Jason Adams celebrates the swine flu pandemic as only someone with an extensive knowledge of postapocalyptic movies and a great love of screencaps can.

* Finally, a very happy birthday to TheOneRing.net, an amazing 10 years old today. That’s an uncountably long time in Internet years. And gosh, I actually remember checking the site out back when Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings movies were first announced in 1999, from the computer lab on Old Campus where I had to go to use the Internet because our ramshackle off-campus house didn’t have it. TORn was a trailblazer for franchise-specific fansites, becoming a genuine industry powerhouse as far as all things Rings are concerned without ever devolving into attention-whoring or the meanspirited aspects of fandom in the process. I’m grateful for it and wish them 10 more years of success.

7 Responses to Carnival of souls

  1. Tom Spurgeon says:

    What do you think of Maude Findlay vis-a-vis Dorothy Zbornak?

    I know you’re young enough — even given today — to have seen the latter and maybe not the former but my memory is that Maude Findlay was by far the greater achievement because a) she was in a better show in that Lear and gang ripped into a certain kind of marriage and suburban lifestyle with more brio than the GGs got into the golden years (in a way that was nearly always dripping in maudlin sentiment) b) she had better overall foils, c) the character was much more formidable (I can’t see Dorothy lasting ten minutes with Archie Bunker whereas Maude slaps him around for a full hour’s worth of episodes).

    Granted, I think Vera Charles may have been her best character overall. I just thought it was interesting in that I’ve read a lot of love for Dorothy and that just always struck me as a good actor and okay character in a not very good show, a third graph mention, not the lead one. To me it’s like when Carroll O’Connor died to have read people gush about Chief Gillespie rather than Archie.

  2. I think there are several things at work here, Tom, but the main thing is generational. People my age grew up watching The Golden Girls as little kids. Then, when we reached the age where nostalgia beckons, the show ended up in near-constant reruns on Lifetime, helping it maintain a prominent place in our mental landscapes. Also (and here’s a just-plain-disagree point) it turned out it was still a great show! The Missus and I have been TiVoing it for years and we’ve probably seen every episode more than once and I laugh out loud, hard, over and over in every episode. It wasn’t like my dad fondly remembering Gabe Kaplan in Welcome Back Kotter only to recoil in horror when it ended up on Nick at Nite years later. There was also the whole thematic and set-up overlap with Sex and the City at the time of the show’s emergence into rerun ubiquity, leading to thinkpieces and a revival of interest in the Girls’ careers and drag theater adaptations of episodes and so on. The gays fucking LOVE The Golden Girls.

    Meanwhile, I’m a reasonably media savvy guy who’s watched a lot of TV and I’ve never seen an episode of Maude, or even a snippet of one while flipping around. It originally aired before my time, it’s never been re-run with anything remotely approaching the wall-to-wall, Law & Order-style omnipresence of Golden Girls, and I could be wrong but I get the sense that Lear’s brand of comedy hasn’t aged well. Golden Girls also did the social button-pushing thing without the supernova presence of an accidental right-wing hero like Archie Bunker overshadowing it and mixing the message. While we’re on the subject, somehow I think the fact that Maude was a spinoff works against it as well–you hear about about The Mary Tyler Moore Show more than you hear about Rhoda or Lou Grant. (As far as AitF spinoffs go, my generation really only has room in its heart for The Jeffersons.)

    There’s other stuff, like I think Dorothy’s not-as-formidable-ness is a feature, not a bug–the show wouldn’t work if Stan, Sophia, Rose, and Blanche couldn’t get under her skin or go toe to toe with her occasionally. But the main takeaway for you here is that you’re old.

  3. Curt says:

    Huh–I just saw on Spurgeon’s that it’s your birthday. Well, happy birthday!

  4. Tim O'Neil says:

    But the main takeaway for you here is that everybody dies frustrated and sad, and that is beautiful.

  5. Tom Spurgeon says:

    Really? Okay. I wasn’t really talking about liking — I don’t care for Maude — but I guess maybe I should have looked at it that way. I worry for the day your generation loses Fran Drescher.

    (Do you think this was the first time anyone ever flaunted their more immediate knowledge of Golden Girls to prove someone else was old?)

  6. Don’t even get me started on the brilliance of Bobbi Flekman, Tom.

  7. Curt: Thanks! And thanks to you too Tom!

    Tim: Dave Stevens, yes, but apparently not Bea Arthur. They Might Be Giants lied to us AGAIN!

Comments are closed.