Playing a Game of Thrones: Why you should read George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series

Regular readers of this blog are no doubt aware (to say the least!) that I am a big fan of George R.R. Martin’s series of fantasy novels called A Song of Ice and Fire, and that I’m eagerly anticipating the HBO series adapting them, called Game of Thrones. But a few days ago I realized that you might not know why. Credit for this goes to my blogging chum Curt Purcell, who used the occasion of my umpty-millionth post on the topic to ask:

Without giving too much away, can you maybe hit a few bullet-points about what sets SONG OF ICE AND FIRE apart from other similar fantasy series? It sounds so run-of-the-mill, even when people gush about it. What am I missing that would make me want to read it?

As I said in the comment I left to answer his questions, I’m such an enthusiast for this material that I don’t know if I’ll be any good at expressing or explaining why. (I’m also emotionally and physically exhausted due to all sorts of off-blog goings-on this past week and am not at my most cogent.) But I’ll take a shot at running down some of the series’ distinguishing characteristics. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the hard sell.

First off, what exactly are we talking about here? Well, as I said, A Song of Ice and Fire is a series of epic fantasy novels by writer George R.R. Martin, whom some comic fans and nerds may know from his involvement with the Wild Cards series of revisionist-superhero prose novels, or for his time on the writing staff for the Ron Perlman/Linda Hamilton Beauty and the Beast TV show. So far, four volumes of a (sort-of^) planned seven have been released: A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings, A Storm of Swords, and A Feast for Crows. The HBO series, spearheaded by David Benioff and Dan Weiss, takes its title (sans indefinite article) from the first volume and will debut on April 17; the plan is to adapt one book per season, although the books get so long that some may need to be spread over the course of two seasons.

What’s the setting? Without spoiling anything important, here goes: The books take place mostly in a land called Westeros, your basic roughly medieval-European epic fantasy setting, albeit one with far, far fewer overt trappings of fantasy than, say The Lord of the Rings — humans are the only game in town in terms of races, and we’re several generations removed from the last time magic/sorcery or mythical creatures like dragons were a going concern. The main fantastical feature when the story begins is how the flow of seasons work: Summer and winter can each last for years, decades even, before shifting unpredictably.

Westeros, which ranges from an arctic climate up north to a Mediterranean one down south and has similar cultural lines of demarcation, was once divided up into Seven Kingdoms, each ruled by great families, or Houses. But for centuries now, the whole continent has been united under one ruling King. However, about 15 years or so before the story begins, a group of powerful Houses banded together to overthrow the current king, who had gone insane, thus ending the kingdom’s first and up until that point only dynasty.

What’s the story about? Again, without spoiling anything important: It’s 15 years after Mad King Aerys of House Targaryen was overthrown by an alliance of nobles who were either burned by his cruelty or hungry for power of their own, or some combination thereof. The leader of the alliance, Robert Baratheon, has been king ever since, supported by his wife’s hugely influential, hugely assholish family, House Lannister. But when his mentor and right-hand man dies (or is murdered — no one’s really sure), Robert, who seems well-intentioned but by now is kind of a drunk and glutton and horndog and not a very good king, heads north to seek the help of his best friend, Eddard Stark, who has command of the kingdom’s distinctly unglamorous northernmost area. A Game of Thrones primarily chronicles the conflicts between House Stark and House Lannister as Ned, as he’s known to his friends, tries to help out King Robert and get to the bottom of the mystery of their mutual mentor’s death, and some other shady goings-on as well.

But meanwhile, two threats are brewing beyond the kingdom’s borders and outside the struggle for power and influence surrounding the rival Houses. The first lies in the uncivilized wastelands to the North, beyond a massive Great Wall of China-type structure called The Wall, a 700-foot-tall barrier made totally of ice that stretches from sea to sea. Thousands of years ago some kind of supernatural menace came out of the North to threaten the Seven Kingdoms, and the Wall was constructed after mankind’s victory to keep the threat from coming back. By now it’s been so long that the organization tasked with maintaining the wall is a neglected, ragtag band, ill-prepared for…whatever it is that seems to be going on out there, somewhere.

The other lies overseas, where the only two survivors of the overthrow of House Targaryen, a boy named Viserys and a girl named Danaerys, have hit their teenage years and are trying to mount a comeback. Even though Aerys was a major creep, and Viserys is no great shakes either, if the two of them get the right backers and the right soldiers, they could present a major threat to the new rulers of their old kingdom, who know they’re out there but have no idea how to find them.

Why should I care about any of this? This is really the heart of Curt’s question, and probably yours, if you have a question about the series yourself. Chances are you either are perfectly conversant and comfortable with the standard tropes of fantasy and thus this series’ specific iterations thereof aren’t enough to hook you, or you’re the sort of person who automatically tunes out anytime someone in a tunic whips out a sword and says “I am Aragorn son of Arathorn, heir to the throne of Gondor” or somesuch and thus you’re skeptical that the books would be for you even if they’re the best gosh-darn stories about a made-up kingdom of knights and dragons and shit ever invented. With all of you in mind, I put together a list of what sets the books apart, both for me and, from what I’ve gathered based on talking to and reading about other fans, for a lot of people. This is the stuff that matters.

1) I mentioned this already, but it bears repeating: The fantasy elements are surprisingly minimal, particularly at first. Simply put, if you’re the kind of person who can’t stand elves and orcs and dwarves and wise old wizards, they won’t be around to turn you off out of hand. Now, this wasn’t really a selling point for me, since I’m a person who has the White Tree of Gondor tattooed on my left arm and obviously has no preexisting, in-principle problem with elves and orcs and dwarves and things of that nature. But I think you’d be surprised at how little high/epic fantasy I’ve actually read outside of The Lord of the Rings. The vast majority of my fantasy reading was done when I was a YA reader, and was centered either on satires (Piers Anthony’s Xanth books, Robert Asprin’s Myth series) or sort of off-model, less Tolkienian series (this is the stuff I remember more fondly — Susan Cooper’s The Dark Is Rising Sequence, Ursula K. LeGuin’s Earthsea trilogy, and Lloyd Alexander’s Prydain Chronicles, the most Tolkienian of the group but still pretty far removed from the Elves/Dwarves/Orcs model that dominates much of the genre)). In my mind, I’d come to associate stuff that more directly bore the fingerprints of Professor T or his Gygaxian reinterpreters with either unoriginality, tedium, or cheese. So a series that focused more on character and worldbuilding in the cultural and historical senses of that word than on invented races or bestiaries or magical systems was perfect for me when deciding to give fantasy another try at age thirtysomething.

2) A closely related point: In the absence of magical stuff, the story’s driven by realistic human conflicts. Martin has said that the series’ central struggle for power — the titular game of thrones played by various important people we meet — was inspired by England’s real-world War of the Roses, with its complex web of family loyalties and regional rivalries and so on. In terms of narrative fiction, I think the the closest comparison is The Godfather and The Godfather Part II. A Game of Thrones combines the first film’s story of rival families violently jockeying for supremacy amid all sorts of complex conspiracies and alliances with the second film’s story of the very serious, very smart leader of one of those families trying to uncover the origin of a plot against him and his. The point is that we’re very far from rote Joseph Campbell hero’s-journey fantasy storytelling, with some dude learning it’s his destiny to defeat the Dark Lord. If you’re sick of that sort of thing, you’ll find a lot more to hook you here. This goes double if you’re the sort of person who’s ever enjoyed fictional or non-fictional war epics or gangster stories. “The Sopranos with swords” really is a pretty dead-on way to describe what’s going on here.

3) Another reason “The Sopranos with swords” works, and probably one of the big reasons HBO bit: There’s graphic language, violence, and sex. Again, I’m not particularly well-read in the genre, but this is something I’ve really never seen before, not outside weirdo projects like CF’s Powr Mastrs — and this isn’t some cult-favorite alternative comic series, it’s the most popular and influential contemporary fantasy series other than Robert Jordan’s Wheel of Time. If you’re the sort of person who’s complained that Tolkien’s world is too sexless and bloodless to really care about, believe me, you won’t be voicing similar complaints here. I’ll elaborate on this a bit below, but I also would argue strongly against the notion that any of this is shock for shock’s sake, or rote revisionism. It’s simply Martin writing fantasy the way other writers would write about any other world full of human beings who kill each other and have sex and get pissed off. It’s refreshing. “Deadwood with swords” works here.

4) One last related point: The story isn’t just set in a (relatively) realistic world, driven by realistic human conflicts, and featuring realistic human behavior — it’s powered by relatable human relationships, emotions, drives, desires, and even mistakes. I’ve written about this at length before in somewhat spoilery fashion, but to recap it here, so much of what happens in these books hinges on the personal relationships between the characters, and the way old grudges or old friendships cloud judgment and lead to poor decisions. Perfectly well-intentioned, innately noble characters can’t stand other perfectly well-intentioned, innately noble characters for various reasons that are all too familiar — long-ago affairs, half-forgotten insults, petty jealousies. Characters will know full well that their family is a collection of really awful people, but they’ll still do their level best to help out because hey, it’s family, and it’s psychologically and emotionally tough as hell to leave your family behind. In other words, like all of the best HBO shows did with their respective genres — The Sopranos with the mafia, Deadwood with Westerns, The Wire with cop shows — A Song of Ice and Fire isn’t just surface revisionism, it’s bringing the full weight of richness of literary fiction to genre entertainment.

5) Moving on, here’s a point about the basic logistics of reading these books: The structure of the narrative is highly addictive. Each chapter focuses on a particular character, whose name serves as that chapter’s title, and the characters rotate throughout the book(s). This has the effect of embroiling you in a particular character’s situation or storyline, then immediately popping you over into another’s, so that you find yourself racing through the chapters to get to the next one starring the person you’re interested in — and then getting interested in the ones you’re reading in the interim, and repeating the process over and over. It’s rather brilliant.

6) The raw plot is enormously engrossing. There’s a dynastic struggle that encompasses a murder mystery, a conspiracy, shifting and secret alliances, political machinations — and then brewing underneath it all, two major external threats. You find yourself wanting almost desperately to get to the bottom of it all, and Martin is a strong enough writer to keep adding elements without drowning out the ones that hooked you in the first place. A good comparison here might be Lost, where each time you hit the ground level of the until-then central strain of antagonism, the creators yanked the rug out and revealed another beneath it. The shape and scope of the story is perpetually enriching and expanding.

7) I think Martin’s a pretty strong prose craftsman. There are a few groaners in there, especially in the first book (I think there are two warm fires in the hearth that couldn’t chase away the coldness in Character X and Y’s hearts, for example), but let’s just say that my dayjob sees a lot of SF/F pass across my desk and some of it is embarrassingly badly written. Martin knows his way around the typewriter.

8.) Big surprises, as shocking and powerful as any I’ve read or seen in any work of narrative fiction ever. Stuff that’s on the level of all-time gut-punches like “I did it thirty-five minutes ago” or “You are the dead” (or for you altcomix readers, the big moments in ACME Novelty Library #20 or Love & Rockets: New Stories #3). You want to stay as spoiler-free as possible about these books, that’s all I’ll say. Like, if you start reading them, don’t even read the back-cover or inside-flap blurbs. (Seriously, DON’T.) This is not to say that if you know the surprises, you won’t enjoy the books — I knew one of ‘em and still loved it, just like I knew all of the major deaths in The Sopranos through Season Four and still loved it — but man oh man. There’s one part that had me so stunned and upset I literally lost sleep over it, and sat there rereading the chapter, sure I must have missed something or somehow gotten what I’d read wrong. I didn’t. It was awesome.

9) This is hard to articulate without spoiling the grand arcs of the narrative, but suffice it to say that having read all four currently existing volumes, Martin is playing an impressively long game. I don’t want to say too much more, but when you’ve read enough to start getting a sense of where it may head in the final three volumes, it’s kind of stunning in scope. Seeds planted in the first volume are carefully cultivated and tended to for multiple books and multiple years and multiple thousands of pages and still haven’t blossomed yet. Best of all, I think this all ties to one of the central themes of the series, but again, I don’t want to spoil anything.

10) This one’s important: There’s basically nothing glorious or badass whatsoever about violence as portrayed in these books. Most great fantasies don’t skimp on the emotional consequences of being enmeshed in these great struggles — the scouring of the Shire and Frodo’s departure are obviously the beating heart of The Lord of the Rings just for starters — but I don’t think I’ve ever read a heroic fiction that so relentlessly drives home how war and violence immiserate and degrade everyone who participates in them. There’s a haunting flashback in the first volume that in other hands would have been a depiction of some great and glorious last stand, but Martin imbues it so thoroughly with a sense of great sadness and loss and waste and terror. It’s beautiful and really humanistic. Now, I know Tom Spurgeon, who’s no dummy, disagrees with me on how the violence in the book comes across — he thinks it’s Mark Millar’s Ultimate Lord of the Rings, not because he feels Martin is glib or crass or glorifying the violence, mind you, but simply because he feels the use of violence is primarily calculated to get the material over with maximum genre-tweaking impact — but as he’ll also tell you, he’s in a very small minority on this. Martin, as it turns out, was a conscientious objector during the Vietnam War; I know that doesn’t necessarily reveal a fundamental truth about him beyond “he really didn’t want to go to Vietnam,” but in reading these books, I think his draft board made the right call.

11) That said, when there is action and violence, it’s really strong and really heart-pounding. And when there is fantasy, it’s exciting and strange and awesome, in the original sense of the word. The reason why is the same in both cases: We know that in this world, both swordplay and the supernatural have irrevocable, terrible, life-changing, world-altering consequences.

In short (haha, yeah right), I’m about to say something that I pretty much never say, even about works I deeply love and even to readers whose tastes I feel I understand deeply: I recommend these books without hesitation or qualification. And I’ve done so to readers ranging from my Destructor compadre Matt Wiegle to the fiftysomething mother of two grown children who works in the cubicle next to me, all of whom are basically over the moon for them. If you look into ASoIaF fandom at all, you’ll find this story repeated over and over: Fantasy skeptic gets enthusiastic recommendation from trusted friend, says “What the hell, I’ll give it fifty pages,” and within hours is passing on enthusiastic recommendations of their own. Consider this mine.

^ Why the “sort of”? The series was originally envisioned as a trilogy, but it grew to four volumes and then to six as Martin wrote the initial volumes. When he hit the writing process for the fourth book, he realized the amount of material he wanted to cover would require the book to be split in half even just as a logistical matter, so the series is now slated seven books long. This decision, plus his decision to scrap a planned “five-year jump” for the story between volumes three and four and his subsequent need to re-write and re-conceive a lot of existing work, led to a lengthy delay between A Storm of Swords and A Feast for Crows and a positively infamous delay between Crows and the planned fifth volume, A Dance with Dragons. Martin seemed to have planned to announce a publication date for Dragons during the TCA press tour last week, but an illness around Christmastime sideswiped him; still, I expect an announcement on the book before or when the HBO series debuts in April. (back)

27 Responses to Playing a Game of Thrones: Why you should read George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series

  1. Excellent post! You really spoke to nearly every thing I love about this series. I’d only add is how great the ‘visuals’ are in the series; from the epic to the macabre, Martin offers up some truly incredible images that stick with you for, well, years really. Again, great job.

  2. Sean,
    As you know, you got me to start reading these, so your work was already done before you did this massive sell job, but having read just the first volume and just got the second now, I agree with all of it so far. I would just be repeating, but yeah, all of the above is correct. I’m not averse to fantasy (hey, I read superhero comics) but this is the first prose fantasy series I’ve read since LOTR, and that was like 25 years ago. I’m more a, I dunno, Lethem or Auster guy, but you cracked through whatever reservations I had and I’m grateful. Just like The Sopranos is a cut above the same old gangster drama, or The Wire better than any cop show, Martin’s series, or at least AGoT, the one I’ve read, is done well enough and with such good characterization and suspenseful plotting that it really does have the ability to draw in those who aren’t hardcore SF/Fantasy readers.

  3. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mindless Ones. Mindless Ones said: RT @theseantcollins: Playing a Game of Thrones: Why you should read George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series http://is.gd/asoiaf [...]

  4. Tom Spurgeon says:

    I want to offer up an objection to how my criticism was portrayed here. I don’t think the Fire and Ice books are like Mark Millar in any way except that I feel that certain moments of violence and drama are manipulative and I suspect that Martin is conscious of this and how these moments play against expectations of the genre. I don’t think that Martin and Millar share the notion that violence is glorious: I think it’s your response to me to say they don’t share this and that this is more important than any similarity I see. In other words, that’s you making a distinction, not you providing a direct counter-argument to my argument. I pretty much agree with that distinction in every way except for its primacy.

    The only reason I used Millar as an example is thought that single point would communicate quickly and easily to a comics-savvy audience. Clearly, I was wrong: people have a different conception of Millar than I do. Martin’s a writer in a far different weight class than Millar, and other than the fact that I think they manipulate aspects of the genre to startling effect that doesn’t quite convince me, they’re very UN-alike.

    Martin’s a fine prose craftsman, he can work up a character in shorthand in a way that’s very entertaining and the books are fun and have a lot of integrity. I like the underlying ethos of the violence. A TV show adaptation could be a blast. I just don’t think they’re great books. And yes, I’m in a small minority on that one!

    • Sorry to have mischaracterized you, Tom. I guess you’re right and the main takeaway the superhero-comic-reader-CW gets from the use of violence in Millar’s work isn’t primarily “coldly, if shrewdly, manipulative genre revisionism,” it’s primarily “wouldn’t it be awesome if Batman raped the Joker–because he was secretly BLACK???” crassness.

  5. Davey Oil says:

    Great post, Sean. You’ve already sold me on the series as well, and I am sure glad you did. I never would have given it a shot if not for your writing. I’ve just got a thing about Wild Cards and everything I associate with it.
    Just bugs me. Jokers.
    You’ve made a lot of oblique references to some of the books’ most “longest gamest” mysteries. Some of those posts I missed before, because I wanted to remain spoiler-free. Is there any chance of an all song of ice and fire posts round-up?
    Thanks!

  6. Sean and Chris and Dave (DAVE!!!!), I’m really glad to hear you feel like I got this right. And Chris and Dave (DAVE!!!!), I’m glad you enjoyed the books.

    Dave (DAVE!!!!), I just went back and tagged all my GoT/ASoIaF/GRRM-related posts accordingly — you can use this Game of Thrones tag to search through them. Some are just link posts, others are more in-depth. If i have time, I may go through and create some kind of index for the posts of more interest.

  7. Jac says:

    love the post sean but would like to add another recommendation point (sans spoilers)

    12) Martin has written some of the best female characters in fiction. I think they cover everything under the sun, they are nowhere near perfect and are increasingly complex as the series goes on.

    They are not just – The Dreamer, The Tomboy, The Queen, The Princess, The Mother – and can all be in turns funny, sweet, annoying, frustrating and bloodthirsty (with some becoming more and more sociopathic/psychopathic in nature).

    In some fantasies chicks can barely get a look in and/or be less than 3 demensional characters- LOTR being a prime example.

    love this series and cannot recommend it highly enough

  8. amypoodle says:

    one thing i would add to the section that deals with the lack of fantasy elements, is that, possibly as a result of their scarcity but more likely because martin’s a good, imaginative writer with excellent dramatic timing, when these elements *do* rear their head, they really impress.

  9. amypoodle says:

    whoops. you said that.

  10. Wil Moss says:

    Sold! Just ordered a copy of the first book from Amazon. Martin should cut you a check!

    Looking forward to reading this now, Sean – thanks for the helpful, convincing post!

  11. Great post. As one of those fantasy skeptics now addicted, I think you did a good job summarizing the strengths.

    If I can throw a log on the fire (and extend the HBO simile parade), one thing I like about the books is how it touches upon all levels of Westeros and beyond. It’s a not a story where you’re supposed to root for knights, nobles and kings prancing around in their finery while the rest of the world presumably outside their window burns. You experience every level of society in Martin’s skilled world-building: queens, bastards, scholars, criminals, heroes, exiles, cooks, gluttons, leaders, followers, rich. and poor. His prose illuminates the large and small alike. For all the power games and epic scope, the cast of characters and concerns are very well grounded. “The Wire with swords” works here.

    And one more: These books always make me hungry. His descriptions of at least two dozen obscure medieval dishes are lip-smacking. Never have I so powerfully desired lamprey pie, whatever the hell that is.

  12. Davey Oil says:

    I don’t think I need to read the words, “mummer” or “mummer’s farce” even one more time. Every single character, left talking long enough, will use the same single piece of slang? I’d love to have some character just look up and comment on that phrase. “Boy, we sure talk about mummers a lot.”
    It’s like a William Gibson novel, with the authors tic-like need to insinuate certain, extremely idiosyncratic slang into the dialogue of practically any character; “jack move” and “lateral” will be uttered by any and all, novel after novel. I’m sure that quite a lot in Westeros can remind one of a “mummer’s farce” but I just dont believe that such unique, and as Sam points out above, socially distinct, individuals would all share this one bit of…
    okay, you all know what I mean.
    (hi, Sean!)

  13. [...] way and some of my friends asking what the fuss is all about, I penned a spoiler-free run-down of why you should read George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series — fantasy books I think just about anyone will find enthralling. If you’ve heard of the [...]

  14. J Tan says:

    I think it would be incredibly frustrating to read a series that never seems to finish. At some point one stops caring, because although it would be nice to get some resolution of the central themes, it never seems to come. The wait between books is interminable – Martin’s planned narrative 5 year gap between books 3 and 4 turned out to be a real 5 year gap, and the gap between books 4 and 5 is even longer. It’s entirely likely that the planned HBO series will catch up with the books.

    So, no, for me this series isn’t worth reading, at least until it is finished, which could be in 10 years time, or never.

    • The wait is unfortunate, though less so for me than for people who’ve been reading since day one instead of since last year. But it seems a bit unreasonable to expect a resolution of the central themes before the final book in a series, no matter how many times the number of volumes in that series is expanded or how many years it takes for each new volume to arrive. I get the sense you’re not one to give much credence to Martin’s predictions about when the series will wrap up, and I can see why, but to be fair he’s advanced a quite reasonable argument that the wait for A Dance with Dragons is atypical, that the writing process for it has led to the completion of many chapters for the subsequent volume, that once he’s through this bottleneck the remaining books will take much less time to write, and that the pace of production for an HBO series of this sort coupled with the likelihood that A Storm of Swords will be split over two seasons buys him quite a bit of time, so he probably WILL finish the final book before the show catches up. Now, it’s obviously your call not to read the series until it’s finished — I often do that with long manga series myself — but I would argue that the responses in this thread alone are evidence that a great many people find the series “worth reading” without it yet being finished.

  15. [...] disclosure (not that it’s even necessary if you’ve noticed my posts on this topic for the past few months): I am a giant nerd for George R.R. Martin’s epic fantasy series A [...]

  16. Renny Christopher says:

    Sean–I just finished the Subtext annotated version of AGOT. It was a really terrific reading experience. When will there be an annotated edition of A Clash of Kings?

  17. [...] is for you. However, if you’ve done neither and you’re here to find out what GoT is, an article by Sean Collins will catch you up in no time. When you’re done being converted to a fan, or if you are already [...]

  18. I think this is one of the most important info for me.
    And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on some general
    things, The web site style is wonderful, the articles is really
    excellent : D. Good job, cheers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>