A spoilery comparison of Lost and Battlestar Galactica

SPOILER ALERT FOR BOTH SHOWS, SO UNLESS YOU’VE SEEN ALL OF BOTH OF THEM, STAY AWAY IF YOU KNOW WHAT’S GOOD FOR YOU

Okay, you knew this had to happen once you saw what went on in the Lost finale. I came thisclose to promising a separate post on this topic in my Lost thoughts last night, and when I woke up this morning multiple people had already asked me to do so. Like I said, you knew it had to happen.

I think there are two big differences between the two finales, both of which were a mainline hit of mysticism.

First, the mysticism of the Battlestar Galactica finale tied in directly to the show’s central driving conflict and overarching mythology. The “God” we hear about here was the one responsible for such major mystical mysteries as Gaius Baltar’s visions of Six (and Caprica Six’s visions of Gaius Baltar) and Kara Thrace’s strange resurrection, and is the “truth” behind the bowdlerized judgmental monotheism of the Cylons and the more humanistic but still off-model polytheism of the Colonists. In Lost‘s case, while it does seem like the Island is the world’s most direct manifestation of the force for good behind the flashsideways afterlife, that’s a link in a much more general sense. It seems like any group of people who were tied together by anything would have ended up in much the same place; moreover, the Island plot is resolved without requiring any knowledge of the show’s conception of the afterlife, if that makes sense. The afterlife ties things together emotionally, not narratively, whereas in BSG, it’s linked directly to the big plot questions.

The second and more damning thing for Lost is that its conception of spirituality as articulated in that final sequence is awfully banal: The afterlife is a place generated by the force of goodness behind all major religions where you reunite with your loved ones, atone for your sins and shortcomings, and find true happiness before achieving literal enlightenment. Generic New-Age self-help stuff–whoopedy doo! By contrast, the “God” of Battlestar Galactica embraces its own sneer quotes and acts in morally dubious fashion in order to push humanity and cylonity (?) through a series of cycles of genocide and rapprochement for reasons still unknown. The God of BSG is a weird thing whose role in the finale is still haunting and challenging me today, whereas the creators of Lost could have just mailed every viewer a copy of The Celestine Prophecy and been done with it.

Actually, now that I think of it, the God of BSG is a bit like what we thought about “the Island” when we believed it was the source of all the manipulative goings on, before Jacob and the Man in Black entered the picture–a near-omnipotent force that’s probably ultimately a force for what we’d consider “good” but which on the way there does all sorts of heinous shit for reasons we can’t begin to comprehend in the moment.

Finally, I’ve always found it super-stupid to object to genre fiction simply because you discover its conception of the supernatural doesn’t jibe with your own: I read people saying things like “The Exorcist isn’t scary to me because I’m not Catholic” and simply can’t fathom how crazy that is. You don’t find many mackerel-snappers more lapsed than me but I still get the chills when they chant “The power of Christ compels you!” So it’s not like I’ve got beef with Lost for having a relatively upbeat view on spirituality whereas I tend not to. But I do tend not to. I find the atheist/anti-mysticism apoplexy over Lost‘s finale–seriously, people were losing their shit on Twitter–as silly and funny and pathetic and small-minded as I did when it happened at the end of BSG; that said, my hunch is that if there is a God then he’s a lot more like the vast and cool and unsympathetic entity running the show in the BSG universe, or like “the Island” or like a one-man Jacob/Man in Black mash-up. I figured I might as well cop to that.

8 Responses to A spoilery comparison of Lost and Battlestar Galactica

  1. Kennyb says:

    Kennyb:

    I guess part of that is the difference in writing a blockbuster ending for a show with as wide of a fan base as Lost versus writing one for a much smaller market like BSG’s. Ally and I were talking about some of the things that they could have done instead of having everybody hugging in heaven at the end (she wanted the Man in Black to get off the island, and presumably terrorize the world), and I kept countering with “Well, there’s no way that ABC would have put an ending like that to something which is watched by so many people.” Which is a really shitty way to write a show.

    In Battlestar, much of the show (and the entire last season) was dedicated to getting to that last episode, and the finale fit very well into the framework that was constructed. I really felt like it was the only ‘logical’ conclusion that the show could have made, and it was really fulfilling because of it. In Lost, the ending could have been 5 different things, all of which kind of sort of resolved the major storylines in some vaguely acceptable way. Nuclear explosion caused a universal rift which had an affect reaching backwards in time as well as forward? Sure! Jack goes down into the light, becomes a white smoke monster to battle the Man in Black in an epic battle in front of the ghosts of everyone that has ever died on the island? Why not? This last episode of Lost was a Jenga piece placed gingerly on top of an organic structure that had no real designer. The last episode of BSG was like a Lego block clicking into place – brought a real sense of resolution (or at least hope), and belonged there.

  2. What I can tell you is that the BSG finale knocked me flat on my ass, as did The Sopranos finale. Whatever the strengths and weaknesses of Lost’s finale–and on the whole I think it’s strong–it’s much more of a delayed reaction, I think because of all the misdirection by the writers you cite. Anything could have happened, and this is what DID happen, and now I have to make sense of it; it’s not like BSG or The Sopranos’ “retrospectively inevitable destination,” to quote The House Next Door.

  3. Tim O'Neil says:

    Maybe this is an old refrain by now, but . . . with all the hubbub over the last episode of the show, I was actually thinking it might be a good time to start watching it. Netflix has all the seasons on Watch It Now, so it would be an easy enough matter to start. But now that the finale is out and I hear that the conclusion is “Because: God,” I don’t think I’ll ever bother. There is no less interesting way to end a story than “Because: God.”

    As someone who has never seen a minute of the show, but has seen bits and bobs of the commentary and speculation that has popped up across the internet for many years running, it seems almost comically inept to take something that so many people have invested so much time and enthusiasm into watching and discussing, and then basically end with “Because: God.”

  4. That’s a highly inaccurate summary of the ending and reveals just how much a certain segment of the audience’s brain shuts down the second that the spiritual-supernatural is invoked in any way. If what you come away with is “because God,” you’ve got bigger problems in terms of viewing comprehension than just not liking the Lost finale.

  5. Tim O'Neil says:

    Well, is God involved or not?

  6. “Well, is God involved or not?”

    “No.”

    Actual LOL.

  7. Have been jonesing hard for a new Lost ever since the show ended that I gonna start reading The Dark Tower. (I just hope that the ending is more fulfilling).

Comments are closed.